Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Mr. Justice Alito...got a nice ring to it!
1 posted on 01/15/2006 3:41:39 PM PST by Aussie Dasher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Aussie Dasher

He's warming up.

2 posted on 01/15/2006 3:44:50 PM PST by Paleo Conservative (Happy New Year!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aussie Dasher

who needs to expect when we have PROOF that he leans to the right
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1558659/posts


3 posted on 01/15/2006 3:45:10 PM PST by minus_273
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aussie Dasher
Earl Warren Warren Burger David Souter Alito expected to move court to right

We'll see.

4 posted on 01/15/2006 3:45:30 PM PST by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aussie Dasher

The only radicals I know are left wing nuts. Take a look at that Vermont judge....60 days for raping a 4 year old for years!! And the state wants treatment for HIM!!!! President Bush is a conservative, it is his right to nominate whoever he pleases.


5 posted on 01/15/2006 3:46:00 PM PST by Blue Turtle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aussie Dasher
Judge Samuel A. Alito Jr. is poised to join a tradition of pragmatic justices who have moved the Supreme Court to the right in measured steps.

Two comments: He will likely move them more towards literacy than conservatism; and it would be surprising if he does not substantially improve the quality of written decisions - O'Connor was horribly convoluted and vague where she didn't need to be.

7 posted on 01/15/2006 3:51:09 PM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aussie Dasher

Alito expected to move court to right

NOOOOOOOOOOO ... SAY IT AIN'T SO !!!

9 posted on 01/15/2006 3:56:13 PM PST by Mr_Moonlight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aussie Dasher
... almost nothing was learned in Senate confirmation hearings about Judge Alito's views on transcendent issues likely to come before the court, such as abortion.

tran - scen - dent
1 a : exceeding usual limits : SURPASSING
  b : extending or lying beyond the limits of ordinary experience
  c in Kantian philosophy : being beyond the limits of all possible experience and knowledge
2 : being beyond comprehension
3 : transcending the universe or material existence

So abortion is beyond comprehension according to The Washington Times? Wow, what an admission.

11 posted on 01/15/2006 3:58:23 PM PST by Brujo (Quod volunt, credunt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aussie Dasher

Ya reckon?


13 posted on 01/15/2006 3:59:49 PM PST by SmithL (Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Lift up your gates and sing, Hosana in the highest! Hosana to your King!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aussie Dasher

One would certainly hope so, but one never knows. That is what makes life intersting.


15 posted on 01/15/2006 4:01:31 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aussie Dasher

Advice to our liberal friends:

Invite a strict constructionist to lunch. Giving up your obsession with the ACLU will give you new confidence (and new brain cells).


16 posted on 01/15/2006 4:05:23 PM PST by Liberty Wins (Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of all who threaten it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aussie Dasher

Actually, the court won't be moved to the right overwhelmingly. Too many conservatives think that Sandra Day O'Conner was a clone of Ruth Bader Ginsburg. O'Conner wasn't the worst of them. She did oppose government takeover of private property, for example.

It's the next vacancy that will really decide the future of the Court. Let's hope it happens while Bush is still in office and the GOP still controls the Senate.


17 posted on 01/15/2006 4:11:49 PM PST by Clintonfatigued (Sam Alito Deserves To Be Confirmed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aussie Dasher

18 posted on 01/15/2006 4:11:54 PM PST by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aussie Dasher

Nah....I think he'll move them more to the CONSTITUTION....which is WHERE they SHOULD BE!!! sheesh.


20 posted on 01/15/2006 5:17:17 PM PST by goodnesswins (Here in the Seattle area.....It's time to build Arks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aussie Dasher
The Court moved to the left in measured 18" steps. We are taking it back in baby steps but taking it back we are. Beyer and Souter were horrible disappointments.

Do you think Ginsberg would have been confirmed were the republicans to use the criteria established by Kennedy and his ilk? I think not. In fact, she couldn't get confirmed even now because the Schumer/Feinstein/Kennedy recalcitrance has set the new tone for the procedure!

Please, oh please have the dems pull the filibuster ploy. That would mean the end to socialism in this country as we know it!
21 posted on 01/15/2006 5:47:53 PM PST by lawdude (LIEberals/socialists make up facts and history as they go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aussie Dasher
Llegal experts see him as being closer to Justice Scalia than Justice Thomas in his incremental approach to overturning what the court has done before.

I do too.

Roe v Wade will soon be re-visited and found defectively unconstitutional IF Justice Kennedy can be counted on to ignore European Law.

26 posted on 01/15/2006 6:18:06 PM PST by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aussie Dasher
David Souter: The single most stupid selection EVER by a Republican.

Thank you GH-NWO Bush for that AND ensuring Bubba Clinton's election with your sham campaign in '92.

27 posted on 01/15/2006 6:21:35 PM PST by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aussie Dasher; P-Marlowe; jude24; OrthodoxPresbyterian

While Alito is probably an improvement over many who are already on the court, to include O'Conner, I think he showed far too much deference to precedence, the precious stare decisis, at the Supreme Court level.

If they're killing people, and precedent says it's OK, and even if it's been ruled OK a thousand times or more by previous Supreme Courts, it is still wrong, and such a precedent deserves no credence whatsoever and should be immediately overturned.


35 posted on 01/16/2006 4:10:43 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson