To: Libloather
Does the "secret results" mean the findings will be classified and therefore unavailable to we sheeple?
2 posted on
01/15/2006 9:30:38 AM PST by
coloradan
(Failing to protect the liberties of your enemies establishes precedents that will reach to yourself.)
To: Libloather
This was in Thursday's USA Today?
3 posted on
01/15/2006 9:30:58 AM PST by
Peach
To: Libloather
Released? Or locked away?
4 posted on
01/15/2006 9:31:40 AM PST by
MizSterious
(Anonymous sources often means "the voices in my head told me.")
To: Libloather
5 posted on
01/15/2006 9:33:45 AM PST by
shield
(The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge: but fools despise wisdom and instructions.Pr 1:7)
To: Libloather
..."The problem is the court could still black out large portions to protect the privacy of those named"
How much of it will be redacted?
To: Libloather
On my birthday. Too bad, what I really wanted was an unredacted version.
9 posted on
01/15/2006 9:52:05 AM PST by
atomicpossum
(If I don't reply, don't think you're winning. I often just don't bother to argue.)
To: Libloather
This is the kind of stuff that should be "leaked".
11 posted on
01/15/2006 9:59:14 AM PST by
sportutegrl
(People who say, "All I know is . . ." really mean, "All I want you to focus on is . . .")
To: Libloather
The CIA leaks secrets like an old barge, but this Barrett Report is air tight.
17 posted on
01/15/2006 10:16:28 AM PST by
6SJ7
To: Libloather
bump for publicity (that the Barrett Report will probably never get)
20 posted on
01/15/2006 10:26:16 AM PST by
VOA
To: Libloather
Everyone knows why this is being done and whom it is protecting. This outrage is being done in broad daylight. Can anyone say Kitty Genovese?
25 posted on
01/15/2006 12:49:44 PM PST by
doug from upland
(NEW YORK TIMES -- traitorous b*st*rds)
To: Libloather; doug from upland; Calpernia; Cindy; Alamo-Girl; backhoe; bd476
In before the ZOT Wite-out....
27 posted on
01/15/2006 4:20:35 PM PST by
The Spirit Of Allegiance
(SAVE THE BRAINFOREST! Boycott the RED Dead Tree Media & NUKE the DNC Class Action Temper Tantrum!)
To: Libloather; All
Does anyone know if the redactions, suppression, etc. can be legally challenged?
Aren't we the people entitled to know that the clintons abused their power and sicced the IRS on the opposition?
If it can be shown that the purpose of the redactions were the concealment of clinton abuse of power and other clinton crimes, would the restrictions hold?
And was it really malpractice, i.e., stupidity, on the right that allowed this to happen? Or was it malfeasance?
29 posted on
01/15/2006 5:05:37 PM PST by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson