[Ichneumon]

A few evolutionists claiming that the theory of evolution is a fact is not very impressive. If it were a 'fact', there would be no reason for them to refer to evolution as a theory; would there?

This has been explained at least a dozen times now. Why do you continue to pretend it hasn't?

There are theories of evolution about the processes involved in the fact of evolution. It's not an "either/or" situation.

[connectthedots]

There are theories of evolution about the processes involved in the fact of evolution. It's not an "either/or" situation.

The first part of the first sentence is an admission that evolution is not a fact because it refers to "theories about the processes". The second sentence contradicts the first sentence. The strained parsing of words by evolutionists approaches that of Bill Clinton's "It depends on what you definition of "is" is.