Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FairOpinion; A CA Guy
Why would McClintock risk handing the governorship to the most liberal Democratic candidate on the ballot?

I don't think that was a overly "genuine" risk. Bustamante cooked his own goose -- on a nationwide level, already with his "past assertions and affiliations". But yes, it was a risk. From my pov, the risk was "how much hidden money in those "closets", did Dems have to "get out" or "manuever" the vote. Dems assessed correctly, IMHO, to re-direct some of those amounts elsewhere after the Bustamante "flap". Then! McClintock went for his feint. Which, IM Assessment threw more votes into the Arnold category. And remind you -- we are talking about voters, regardless of political identity -- who voted in majority FOR Props 187, Ron Unz's init, "the marriage" as one-man-one-woman" init, and 209. (off the top my head, forgive me, I can't recall the init numbers affirmatively, and don't wish to get them wrong -- these were good inits.)

357 posted on 01/14/2006 4:47:15 PM PST by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 325 | View Replies ]


To: Alia

I think CA has become much more liberal in recent years.


363 posted on 01/14/2006 4:49:28 PM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 357 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson