Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Schwarzenegger's re - election chances up
The Argus ^ | Jan. 13, 2005 | Steve Geissinger

Posted on 01/13/2006 4:35:43 PM PST by FairOpinion

A recent poll shows the born-again "moderate" Republican governor has gained back some popularity, especially in the Bay Area, and is now in a dead heat with Democratic competitors.

"Our survey demonstrates that Schwarzenegger's retreat from the more conservative rhetoric and agenda he brandished during the latter part of 2005 has paid off among middle-of-the road voters," said Melinda Jackson, director of the Survey and Policy Research Institute at San Jose State University.

The governor's job performance rating among voters in a Democrat-leaning state has climbed from 36 percent positive and 53 percent negative in September, to 40 percent positive and 51 percent negative this month.

(Excerpt) Read more at insidebayarea.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: arnold; arnoldpoll; cagop; calgov2006; california; camilk; popularity; republicrat; rino; schwarzenegger; sjsu; sjsupoll
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 1,061-1,070 next last
To: calex59

You can't have it both ways. On one hand you say that the Dems outnumber us in CA, then you want a Republican to be more conservative, so how is he going to get elected?

By your own statement a Republican can only get elected if he gets some Dem votes, so how is a conservative Republican going to get Dem votes?

The delusional Republican base IS the problem. They keep pushing unelectable nominees. By sheer luck and providence we get Arnold elected, then instead of supporting him, they spend all their time tearing him down and want to see the state go down the tubes, just so they can blame it on Arnold. And they prefer to be permanently ruled by the Dems, just so they can cry and cry on bulletin boards.


81 posted on 01/13/2006 8:16:13 PM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: doodlelady
And I'm so sorry to see that proposed here

Not a proposal and not for everyone. Little chance of it happening in California. Conservative Democrats are as unwelcome in the CADEM as conservative Republicans are in today's CAGOP.

It makes sense from my perspective only because of the unique circumstances that got us here. In the ordinary flow of partisan dealings a fellow like Schwarzenegger, sponsored by an old party nemisis, would have never gotten the nod and we wouldn't be having this exchange and I wouldn't be looking for someone, anyone, as long as their philosophy was conservative.

82 posted on 01/13/2006 8:17:36 PM PST by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

I ask you again, please provide some proof and logic to support your rants.

The FACT that there are NO Republicans in statewide offices, with the exception of Arnold, PROVES MY point.


83 posted on 01/13/2006 8:17:57 PM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Amerigomag

"If McClintock challenges Schwarzenegger".... THEN a DEMOCRAT, ANY DEMOCRAT will be a shoo-in, which is what you really want. So stop pretending to be a conservative when all you are trying to do is to "divide and conquer" by splitting the conservatives, to give a clear field to the Democrats.


84 posted on 01/13/2006 8:20:20 PM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
I am sorry but the base is not the problem. The problem is we have to many people on welfare, to many queers who think that the dems are their salvation, etc. who vote Dem. I will not number all the idiots we have in CA that are electing Dems.

Yes, I say a republican should stick by his/her values when elected, otherwise why bother to run?

If Arnold wants to be a democrat then he should run as one. He IS a dem, the only reason he ran as republican was so he could run in the recall election. The man is his only problem

If a republican runs for office then they should BE a republican. You are trying to blame the base for not voting, you are full of Sh**. We voted, Arnold is a rino and will probably be re-elected because he is openly embracing a democratic party line now and sucking up to the unions and other dems.

Being elected does our party no good if they person elected holds to democratic values, if you can't see that then you are truly blind.

85 posted on 01/13/2006 8:23:07 PM PST by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
You don't understand California to say that.

Our biggest problem is so many people have connections to government employment and unions connected to government employment.
This gives hundreds of millions each election to be used to maintain or get more power by them.
They maintain or gain power through Democrats, so the Democrats have control of the state in the Legislature.

The people in the state mostly lead a good life and are not all that active in politics. They all mostly don't understand the consequences of having liberals in power in the state and how it hurts prosperity and business.

Our problem is we need to do a lot of educating and it will take a long time.

The recent increases in home prices have made the state flow with cash from some doubling of property taxes.

The Conservatives need to get out and vote in heavy numbers more often and the Republican party needs IMO to have a branch that goes from door to door regularly or mails material to educate the electorate.

If we can swing 7% of the voters from left to right, then we have a strong conservative state regarding politics.

We need to keep trying.
86 posted on 01/13/2006 8:24:43 PM PST by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
"The delusional Republican base IS the problem. They keep pushing unelectable nominees."

Keep insulting the base, Poindexter. That's the way to get them back in line like good little lemmings to vote for their liberal RINO betters.

87 posted on 01/13/2006 8:27:00 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Cheney X -- Destroying the Liberal Democrat Traitors By Any Means Necessary -- Ya Dig ? Sho 'Nuff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

Dig it, FO, you've posted no facts, you insult good Conservatives on this board, and you expect people to swallow your pablum-puking leftist bilge and then whine like a little baby every time your delusional rantings "And 90% of the California voters will NOT vote for McClintock no matter what. So guess who is going to get elected? Certainly NOT McClintock" are exposed for the lies and horsecrap that they are. Why don't you do us all a favor and go back to DU ? Of course, even a kook like you might be too much for even them to handle.


88 posted on 01/13/2006 8:32:07 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Cheney X -- Destroying the Liberal Democrat Traitors By Any Means Necessary -- Ya Dig ? Sho 'Nuff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: BlackElk

Your wisdom is greatly needed in this thread, dear sir.


89 posted on 01/13/2006 8:35:46 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Cheney X -- Destroying the Liberal Democrat Traitors By Any Means Necessary -- Ya Dig ? Sho 'Nuff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calex59
The Republicans and supposedly conservative third party types didn't bother to come out and vote in numbers in that special election.

At least Arnold tried, especially against the unions.

We do not have an ***electable*** conservative that could make headway in this state toward conservatism.
Scary thing is Arnold is the only electable guy there is.

McClintock as an example will get 22% of the state wide vote in a two way race with a Democrat and will get a Bustamante elected.

Until we get the conservatives out to vote in mass, nothing will change.
Until the Republican party in our state works on grass roots level to convert people to Republican/conservative, nothing is going to change either until a total financial disaster makes it happen.

90 posted on 01/13/2006 8:46:39 PM PST by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
"If McClintock challenges Schwarzenegger".... THEN a DEMOCRAT, ANY DEMOCRAT will be a shoo-in

Democrats are now entering Republican primaries?

you are trying to do is to "divide and conquer" by splitting the conservatives,

Close but not exactly. I am trying to divide and conquer. But the division is aiming to separate Republicans so they can be more easily identified by conservatives. The conquering is aimed at removing these politcal whores from control of the CAGOP.

91 posted on 01/13/2006 8:48:28 PM PST by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
The Republicans and supposedly conservative third party types didn't bother to come out and vote in numbers in that special election.

As was pointed out earlier in this thread, absolutely ZERO statistics have been published by the Secretary of State to support that contention. The election results would indicate that it is blatantly false. The MOST conservative measures (Prop 73 and 75) did the best. That could not happen if the Conservatives did not show up.

BTW, can you please tell me what, in your opinion, a "conservative third party" is? What issues put them in that category? Spending? Property Rights? Gun Control? Anti-Gay Marriage? Abortion? Please provide some examples.

We do not have an ***electable*** conservative that could make headway in this state toward conservatism. Scary thing is Arnold is the only electable guy there is.

The "only electable guy" there is? You have to be kidding! Not to mention that Arnold isn't conservative at all and is a Republican based only on the letter he chose to put next to his name. He has even abandoned the "moderate" Republican platform on which he ran.

McClintock as an example will get 22% of the state wide vote in a two way race with a Democrat and will get a Bustamante elected.

Can you please provide support for this contention? It is negated by polls during the recall that clearly said McClintock would have beat a Dem in a 2 way race. He also had the highest approval rating of any candidate, from either party.

Until the Republican party in our state works on grass roots level to convert people to Republican/conservative, nothing is going to change either

If the Republican party leadership keeps cramming their socialist cr@p on the voters, they won't have a grass roots left!

92 posted on 01/13/2006 8:55:40 PM PST by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

On voting day I was calling conservative friends and they mostly didn't know it was the day to go to the polls.

I think a bunch of conservatives stayed home that election and let their cause and the state down.


93 posted on 01/13/2006 8:57:49 PM PST by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
We need more than republicans voting enmass. We need to have more republicans in CA, period. We are outnumbered and right now there is nothing to do but try, because we are the minority party in CA. When we do get a republican in office, in this case Arnold, then he/she must stay the course and not cave in to dems, even if it means losing in the congress and senate .

Arnold should have gotten the message out, should have tried to educate the voters instead of doing sound bites such as "girly men", which were amusing but accomplished little.

He should have met with Bush and endorsed him, he should have taken an active part in the election when Babs was re-elected without a struggle and her opponent went down with very little notice. Arnold failed on that account and many others. I will never vote for him, but will not vote for dems either. I would hope he doesn't run again but he will.

We won't win any dems over to our side by whimping out and embracing dem politics.

94 posted on 01/13/2006 8:58:26 PM PST by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

That hardly responds to my post, nor supports your prior contentions.


95 posted on 01/13/2006 9:04:05 PM PST by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: calex59
There were ballot measures and it was understood by most that the unions are a problem.
Even KFI has some hosts that were spending days on this issue.

Arnold can't as a Governor representing ALL THE PEOPLE be spending lots of time giving fireside chats about how evil all the Democrats are, that just isn't done.

The way you make the change and the people who can make the change are the citizens and political parties at the grass roots level. That is where the action is and the Republican party IMO has been severely lacking.

There is an automatic major Democrat block because of union/government employment.
They vote their own wallets in getting the private sector's tax dollars to pay their bloated salaries and benefits.

The UNIONS connected to government all across the country are big parasites and problems for tax payers.
96 posted on 01/13/2006 9:08:58 PM PST by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

If you believe there is no conservative voting block in California that can win an election, guess by your logic we have to find a person left of Arnold to run next time because there are no conservatives to vote for a conservative person, right?

I don't agree to that, I think a lot of conservatives in the state got lazy and didn't bother to vote.


97 posted on 01/13/2006 9:14:39 PM PST by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
If you believe ...

Please don't even try to present my beliefs for me. You are not even close.

Now, can you answer the questions or provide any support for your contentions (e.g. McClintock would only get 22% of the vote). Facts are not on your side.

I don't agree to that, I think ...

Okay, you don't "think" so, but based on what? A "feeling"? Again, the evidence (the votes) don't support that "feeling".

98 posted on 01/13/2006 9:18:15 PM PST by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

Arnold doesn't need "fireside" chats, he just needs to stay the course of republican values. If he isn't re-elected so what? Is it better that he gets elected as a Dem? What is the difference then? Why don't we all just change to Dem? Arnold needs to honor his base and say to hell with the dems, this is what he stands for and he continues to belevieve in it.


99 posted on 01/13/2006 9:19:27 PM PST by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
On voting day I was calling conservative friends and they mostly didn't know it was the day to go to the polls

On November 8, I was also in contact with my circle of conservative friends. Those that hadn't already voted were anxious to get to the polls at the first opportunity. All voted, driven by an urge to defeat liberalism, be it Schwarzenegger's brand or the union's.

So whose anecdotal evidence is correct? We won't know until McPherson makes the partisan voting statistics public.

100 posted on 01/13/2006 9:22:00 PM PST by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 1,061-1,070 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson