To: John W
This would be HUGE.
The only thing better would be getting Bin Laden or Zarqawi.
4 posted on
01/13/2006 3:42:01 PM PST by
jmc1969
To: jmc1969
Isn't Mullah Omar out there somewhere too?
18 posted on
01/13/2006 3:45:55 PM PST by
Little Pig
(Is it time for "Cowboys and Muslims" yet?)
To: jmc1969
Maybe we'll really get lucky and get Zawahiri and bin Laden.
To: jmc1969
89 posted on
01/13/2006 4:05:11 PM PST by
shield
(The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge: but fools despise wisdom and instructions.Pr 1:7)
To: jmc1969
The New York Times must have called him while a predator was nearby.
To: jmc1969
I am of the opinion that those two terrorists have been dead for awhile now.
To: jmc1969
>The only thing better would be getting Bin Laden or Zarqawi<
To me, this is bigger than both. Zawahiri was the brains of al Qaeda. Osama is impotent without him, and Zarqawi will eventually be killed by Iraqis.
325 posted on
01/13/2006 5:02:06 PM PST by
Hoodat
( Silly Dems)
To: jmc1969
Z-man becoming a pinata for newly freed Iraqi's would be great! Saddam spontaneously combusting would be nice too.
385 posted on
01/13/2006 5:24:18 PM PST by
RasterMaster
("Bin Laden shows others the road to Paradise, but never offers to go along for the ride." GWB)
To: jmc1969
If the reports of bin Laden's demise or incapacity are true, then Zawahiri is as big a target as is Zarqawi.
515 posted on
01/13/2006 6:14:26 PM PST by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
To: jmc1969
Yeah, I think I want Zarqawi more than the rest of them.
855 posted on
01/13/2006 9:16:00 PM PST by
doug from upland
(NEW YORK TIMES -- traitorous b*st*rds)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson