Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ed Meese Takes Chris Matthews Head On 1/12/2006 (Cleans Matthews' Clock)
www.freerepublic.com | January 13, 2006

Posted on 01/13/2006 9:08:20 AM PST by Howlin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-171 next last
To: OldFriend

Agreed. It is a comfort to see them, kind of like visiting the old neighborhood. : )


41 posted on 01/13/2006 9:48:57 AM PST by TAdams8591 (The first amendment does NOT protect vulgar and obscene speech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

LOL...[coke up his nose] Matthews did get his clock cleaned.


42 posted on 01/13/2006 9:49:01 AM PST by shield (The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge: but fools despise wisdom and instructions.Pr 1:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TAdams8591

save it to your hard drive.....you'll want to see it more than once!


43 posted on 01/13/2006 9:49:04 AM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
He does it so well you just have to wonder if he really is that stupid, or just misinformed.
44 posted on 01/13/2006 9:49:17 AM PST by MarkeyD (Cowards cut and run. Marines finish the job. I really, really loathe liberals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Tucker Carlson is beginning to really piss me off...


45 posted on 01/13/2006 9:52:59 AM PST by nuffsenuff (Don't get stuck on Stupid - General Russ Honore Sept 21, 2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: nuffsenuff

bttt


46 posted on 01/13/2006 9:54:03 AM PST by Txsleuth (Thank you to all that donated on the Freepathon...next time more monthlies!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS
The technology is different.

I know the technology. Again, it's what the definition of "is" is. Wiretapping is generally used in conversation to mean any interception of your telephone conversations. The sections of the United States Code collectively known as "wiretapping laws" cover any such interception of verbal or electronic communications regardless of technicalities, and the include foreign communications. Meese tried to say it's not tapping on a technicality. Clinton still haunts us.

47 posted on 01/13/2006 9:54:18 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: MarkeyD
You have to wonder if Matthews is a moron, or is intentionally misrepresenting what Scooter Libby was indicted for.

Yes. :P
48 posted on 01/13/2006 9:54:29 AM PST by Jhohanna (Born Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
MEESE: Because this was a legitimate, lawful act by the president.

MATTHEWS: Then why keep it secret?

MEESE: Because you don‘t want the enemy to know that you‘re intercepting and surveilling these kinds of conversation.

Geeez! Come on, Chris! Duh...

49 posted on 01/13/2006 9:57:33 AM PST by SquirrelKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat

There is no legal term that automatically "covers" all such communication. because it cannot anticipate all invention. What are called loopholes simply exploit this fact of life.


50 posted on 01/13/2006 10:02:23 AM PST by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Can we require everyone in the United States to read this exchange?

BTW, thanks for posting this.


51 posted on 01/13/2006 10:06:09 AM PST by Samwise (I freep; therefore, I am.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

I have literally not watched Chris Matthews in at least 2 years. But last night, after hearing that Ed Meese was going to be a guest, I watched.

Meese was fantastic and I'm so very glad you posted this transcript today.

We have so many of the constantly constipated even on this forum telling us just how illegal the NSA spy program is that it was good to hear yet another Attorney General confirm what most of us know!


52 posted on 01/13/2006 10:07:02 AM PST by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Fantistic. Meese got him good, but Matthews is too brain dead to understand he had his butt whipped.
53 posted on 01/13/2006 10:09:52 AM PST by Logical me (Oh, well!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: texasbluebell
Chrissie's mind, such as it is, must be going by now. He's just now getting over a 3rd bout with malaria, after yet another family trip to Africa over Christmas. Why he keeps exposing himself to such a disease is beyond me.

. . . Because his problem is not Malaria?
54 posted on 01/13/2006 10:09:58 AM PST by i_dont_chat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat
YOU again! What's with you picking at this 'wiretapping' issue until Bush is equated with Clinton?

Do you have a special need here to debase Bush?

55 posted on 01/13/2006 10:34:09 AM PST by doberville
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS
There is no legal term that automatically "covers" all such communication. because it cannot anticipate all invention.

Just one law covers "oral communication ... signs, signals, writing, images, sounds, data, or intelligence of any nature" over "wire, radio, electromagnetic, photooptical or photoelectronic" means. It is worded broadly enough to cover everything.

As I said, what "is" is. And you're defending these modern Clintonites.

56 posted on 01/13/2006 10:34:45 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

bump.


57 posted on 01/13/2006 10:34:45 AM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: doberville
What's with you picking at this 'wiretapping' issue until Bush is equated with Clinton?

Bush will never be equated with Clinton, he can't sink that low. But he and his supporters are following the Clinton playbook, and people need to recognize that and call them on it.

Do you have a special need here to debase Bush?

I have a special need to debase politicans who are acting or speaking dishonestly. Bush and his supporters fit that bill sometimes.

Do you have a loyalty to Bush that requires you to defend him when he or his supporters are wrong or dishonest? Do you believe he is more important than this country?

58 posted on 01/13/2006 10:39:53 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

I am quite frankly shocked Matthews allowed Meese on his show. As it pertains to Plame and "Wiretapping" Chrissy's lil ratingless show has been no more than a leftist echo chamber.


59 posted on 01/13/2006 10:40:03 AM PST by FlipWilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Great explanation of this "wire tapping", so-called!! I have been trying to post this for the past month - it is not wire tapping. IT is digital data stream interception - no human being is listening to a conversation or reading an e-mail on the first pass.
60 posted on 01/13/2006 10:46:55 AM PST by p23185 (Why isn't attempting to take down a sitting Pres & his Admin considered Sedition?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-171 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson