The final witness is taking that point, labeling it "collegiality," and dismissing the testimony on that basis alone. His argument is that collegiality is a commodity, and that the evaluation of the the nominee should be based on his record of decisions.
And so, he will go on to distort that record.
LOL. That is exactly what he is doing.
And my only hope is that among the many millions of democrats in this country who are so honestly, and not left-wingers, they will see how democrats dismiss other democrats who say anything nice about a republican, and reconsider their allegiance to a party that will trash their own supporters for speaking their own mind.