Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Seattle Times: YOU CANNOT USE THE NAME "REDSKINS" (Strangely enough, I agree)
The Wall St. Journal ^ | 1/11/06 | James Taranto

Posted on 01/12/2006 10:20:54 PM PST by paulat

An Evergreen Story

On Saturday the Washington Redskins beat the Tampa Bay Buccaneers 17-10 in an NFL wild-card game, which means that this weekend the Redskins travel to Seattle to play the Seahawks, whose 13-3 record is the best in the National Football Conference. The Washington Post, a newspaper in the District of Columbia, reports that this is causing some trouble for a newspaper in Washington state:

To avoid insulting native American heritage, the Seattle Times decided to limit severely the use of the term Redskins in the paper--even if a team with that name will dominate news coverage this week. The Times will not use the moniker in headlines or captions. Reporters can use it only once, as a first reference, in all stories. The Redskins will be referred to almost exclusively as Washington--which could get a little confusing for local readers who also live in that state.

(Excerpt) Read more at opinionjournal.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia; US: Maryland; US: Virginia; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: 1talentless; 2pigleterection; hypersensitivity; letseatmites; liberalmedia; mascot; nfl; thinskined; washingtonredskins
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-233 next last
To: paulat
The word "redskin" derives its meaning from the fact that the skin of American Indians has a much more reddish tone that the skin of white people.

That is a fact. I don't know why that makes you so uncomfortable.

21 posted on 01/12/2006 10:45:56 PM PST by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paulat
I think these warrior culture names offends feminist more than they offend native Americans. Didn't some school drop the the name The Minute Men a few years ago.?

Liberal "ladies" and their metro men are just hiding behind tepees.

22 posted on 01/12/2006 10:46:53 PM PST by lizma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: paulat
GO REDSKINS!

Whether you like it or not.

23 posted on 01/12/2006 10:48:00 PM PST by MinorityRepublican (everyone that doesn't like what America and President Bush has done for Iraq can all go to HELL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: expatguy

I don't find the name "whiteskins" any more appealing.

In the old days of cruelty, I think sometimes people would be skinned alive.

"redskins" creeps me out.


24 posted on 01/12/2006 10:48:32 PM PST by staytrue (Annoy the Media. Vote Republican.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: dead
That is a fact. I don't know why that makes you so uncomfortable.

dead...you are a pain in the posterior...sigh!...but here goes...

I wouldn't like "whiteskins," or "blackskins," or "brownskins," or "yellowskins," or "pinkskins,"....

25 posted on 01/12/2006 10:49:57 PM PST by paulat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: paulat

Dang, the grocery stores up here sell a potato called a "redskin." Wonder what it should be called now?


26 posted on 01/12/2006 10:50:19 PM PST by DakotaRed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

is there room in your tag line to attribute the quote properly ?

at least put quotation marks around it.


27 posted on 01/12/2006 10:50:20 PM PST by staytrue (Annoy the Media. Vote Republican.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: paulat
Re: "Strangely enough...I agree. I think "Redskins" is wrong."

Yep! We call them Deadskins down here in Texas...

And, yeah, they did beat us Cowboys twice this year, but considering we won 14 of the previous 15, and next season is not too far away... Payback is hell, ya know?

28 posted on 01/12/2006 10:50:23 PM PST by Bender2 (Even dirty old robots need love!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paulat

"How many dogs ya got sleepin' under that car jacked up on ceement blocks?"

Boy do I feel dumb (well, no I don't.)

You sound like a whiney liberal. "Oh boo hoo, I'm OFFENDED." Get over it.


29 posted on 01/12/2006 10:51:30 PM PST by NapkinUser ("Our troops have become the enemy." -Representative John P. Murtha, modern day Benedict Arnold.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: paulat
I got more conservative cred than you could ever dream about

Uh-huh. And it shows in threads like this, sorta, kind of...

...(snicker)...

30 posted on 01/12/2006 10:51:51 PM PST by A Jovial Cad ("If you kill enough of them, they stop fighting." -General Curtis LeMay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: paulat

Call them reservation rats. PC is out of hand.


31 posted on 01/12/2006 10:52:05 PM PST by right right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lizma
I think these warrior culture names offends feminist

Oh, give it a rest. Did you see post #12??? Did you read the posts???

32 posted on 01/12/2006 10:52:38 PM PST by paulat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: paulat
I got more conservative cred than you could ever dream about.

Well you just forfeited it with this idiocy.

33 posted on 01/12/2006 10:55:16 PM PST by M. Thatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: paulat
I wouldn't like "whiteskins," or "blackskins," or "brownskins," or "yellowskins," or "pinkskins,"....

You still didn't explain why.

Does the fact that people have different skin colors bother you in some way?

34 posted on 01/12/2006 10:55:46 PM PST by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: M. Thatcher
Well you just forfeited it with this idiocy.

You wish.

35 posted on 01/12/2006 10:56:10 PM PST by paulat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: right right

How about the Washington Gamblers?


36 posted on 01/12/2006 10:56:36 PM PST by Steve_Stifler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

Comment #37 Removed by Moderator

To: paulat

And *I* am offended by your name: paulat. Why? It reminds me of something I saw on TV that I didn't like. Confused? Tough.

Please change your name now.


38 posted on 01/12/2006 10:57:08 PM PST by james500
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: paulat

So slap a temporary decal of a "Pontiac Red" spud on the helmuts, and STILL call them "Redskins".

They're all a bunch of potato heads anyway.


39 posted on 01/12/2006 10:57:49 PM PST by ApplegateRanch (Mad-Mo! Allah bin Satan commands ye: Bow to him 5 times/day: Head down, @ss-up, and fart at Heaven!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paulat

Naw, it's not. What else would you call that kind of peanut?

''Reddish small legumes with the skin still on, tasty when salted''? Rather a longish name for a mascot. Inert, too -- lacks any sort of energy.

Gimme a break. Give the freakin' WORLD a break, f'Heaven's sake. ''Redskins'' is the name of a team's mascot. Teams, as a rule, do NOT choose a mascot they do not admire and respect (I might be persuaded to exempt from this comment the 'Fighting Banana Slugs' of UC-Santa Cruz, but I would probably also except that institution from any concept of 'team' at all, bar possibly cornholing, and would definitely void out of hand the choice of any 'mascot' that institution would 'admire').

Besides which, if you know your NFL history, you will be well aware of the fact that the Washington Redskins were formerly the Boston Redskins, and were named, originally, after the Boston Braves -- much as the (now NFL) Chicago Bears were named after the Chicago Cubs.

If there's ANY offence to be taken about the 'Washington Redskins', it's the persistence of unoriginality in the name of tradition.

And any pseudo-Indian with a lawyer and a part interest in a casino who doesn't happen to like the Washington team's mascot can go and p.u.a.r. (translated: attempt to propel certain renal by-products vertically along a segment of woven hemp).

Bah! No fan of the Redskins here -- yet I'd very much enjoy seeing them waste the Starbucks' boys handily.

Sheesh-a-rama.


40 posted on 01/12/2006 10:57:57 PM PST by SAJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-233 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson