Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
To: RadioAstronomer; longshadow; grey_whiskers; headsonpikes; PatrickHenry; Iris7
To: snarks_when_bored
My brane isn't big enough to understand this.
3 posted on
01/12/2006 11:58:36 AM PST by
SlowBoat407
(The best stuff happens just before the thread snaps.)
To: snarks_when_bored
7 posted on
01/12/2006 12:01:16 PM PST by
rellimpank
(Don't believe anything about firearms or explosives stated by the mass media---NRABenefactor)
To: snarks_when_bored
String theory is fascinating.
I first saw articles on it a couple of years ago now almost every monthly I pick up has something on it.
BTW I find intelligent women extremely sexy.
10 posted on
01/12/2006 12:03:01 PM PST by
HEY4QDEMS
(Learn from the past, don't live in it.)
To: snarks_when_bored
How does this square with Hypersphere Packing?
I thought I'd read about a 24 dimension theory some time back?
To: snarks_when_bored
She was at Princeton, and there's no mention of Witten in the article? (Not that it is required but...)
13 posted on
01/12/2006 12:06:38 PM PST by
in hoc signo vinces
("Houston, TX...a waiting quagmire for jihadis.")
To: snarks_when_bored
14 posted on
01/12/2006 12:10:51 PM PST by
fishtank
To: snarks_when_bored
I caught a bit of her on CSPAN - she was giving a talk in NYC - the contrast between her looks and the freakshow that was her audience was amazing. The audience looked like people had all just walked out a Larsen Far Side cartoon!
16 posted on
01/12/2006 12:15:08 PM PST by
2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
(Is your problem ignorance or apathy? I don't know and I don't care.)
To: All
To: snarks_when_bored
21 posted on
01/12/2006 12:20:36 PM PST by
Jaxter
("Vivit Post Funera Virtus")
To: snarks_when_bored
"Brane and brane: what is Brane!" (with apologies to Captain Kirk)
22 posted on
01/12/2006 12:24:50 PM PST by
Zeppo
To: snarks_when_bored
Yeah, I'm all about that "weakbrane" thing...
25 posted on
01/12/2006 12:29:56 PM PST by
Redbob
To: snarks_when_bored
Quantum physics is shortly going to prove that evolutionists and creationists could BOTH be right, at the same time. Then the real fun will begin.
To: snarks_when_bored
“We will see which one of these ideas from the last 25 years is right,” Arkani-Hamed says. 2007, eh?
29 posted on
01/12/2006 12:53:57 PM PST by
siunevada
(If we learn nothing from history, what's the point of having one? - Peggy Hill)
To: snarks_when_bored
I don't pretend to be a theoretical physicist, but this jabber about string theory just feels wrong. It's like Copernicus being forced to define a geocentric solar system. It can be done, yes, but only by torturing the numbers to fit the concept. Maybe I'm wrong. Maybe this is the opposite, the simplest mathematical route. But it just doesn't seem right to me, for whatever that's worth.
It would be interesting to see a version of this "for Dummies." I think I could grasp the concepts, although I admit the theoretical math eludes me.
31 posted on
01/12/2006 12:54:59 PM PST by
IronJack
To: snarks_when_bored
I have proof there's a Fifth Dimension:
35 posted on
01/12/2006 1:00:14 PM PST by
Freedom_Fighter_2001
(When money is no object - it's your money they're talking about)
To: snarks_when_bored
38 posted on
01/12/2006 1:20:25 PM PST by
Rocky
(Air America: Robbing the poor to feed the Left)
To: snarks_when_bored
On the other hand She could be WRONG..
41 posted on
01/12/2006 1:30:23 PM PST by
hosepipe
(CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole..)
To: snarks_when_bored
Real understanding of how gravity works could initiate a technology revolution as great as that from understanding how electricity works.
43 posted on
01/12/2006 1:48:21 PM PST by
Restorer
To: snarks_when_bored
Placemark for later reading.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
