Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dashing Dasher
Technically, your posting at CP would be cyber stalking, not the other way around.

Actually - I was trying to respond to vicious attacks on me. Then, while trying to respond - I was banned and no longer able to defend myself to your friends' juvenile attacks.

Hope you (and your twisted friends) are proud of yourself.

I didn't ban you.
I didn't even know you were banned.
I assumed you had figured out that the best way to deal with petty attacks was to ignore them.

I don't expect all the people I like to like or even tolerate each other.

So9

69 posted on 01/12/2006 9:46:26 AM PST by Servant of the 9 (Trust Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]


To: Servant of the 9; Dashing Dasher
Yes, but intentional infliction of emotional distress is a major tort, and often brings large $$ settlements in court against the tortfeasor.

Maybe those, at the site that shall remain nameless, should consider that when posting their vile, hate filled, harassing, comments.

I have also seem some things posted there that can be construed as threats and we know that is a violation of criminal statutes.

Invasion of privacy is also something they are known for by posting pics and others personal info.

75 posted on 01/12/2006 10:00:49 AM PST by Jersey Republican Biker Chick (Cleverly disguised as a responsible adult.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson