Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: syriacus

Alito I guess couldn't push this theory, but it has great merit. The Independent Council statute set up a quasi-executive branch of government, performing executive branch functions, but outside the perview of the President.

The constitution specifically requires that ALL executive branch functions be directly controlled by the president. It would be rational to argue that a president should be able to remove any executive branch employee as part of that power, which is why Leahy asked Alito about whether congress could pass a law establishing executive-branch independent commissions where the president could not remove the employees.


1,754 posted on 01/12/2006 10:26:50 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1715 | View Replies ]


To: All

For those watching Fox..

A construction worker fell into a trench in NY. It's because Bush failed to spend money on trench prevention.


1,758 posted on 01/12/2006 10:28:36 AM PST by newnhdad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1754 | View Replies ]

To: CharlesWayneCT
The constitution specifically requires that ALL executive branch functions be directly controlled by the president.

Would that mean... if Congress desires to "get" he President, Congress should "get" him through their own activities?

1,890 posted on 01/12/2006 11:11:40 AM PST by syriacus (Chuck Schumer is outclassed intellectually by Bush's judicial nominees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1754 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson