She's always smiling because she believes that ordinary members of the lumpenproletariat will be fooled, lulled, and disarmed by a smiling face. John Wayne Gacy wore a clown suit for the same reason.
Posted on 01/11/2006 7:14:11 AM PST by forty_years
She's always smiling because she believes that ordinary members of the lumpenproletariat will be fooled, lulled, and disarmed by a smiling face. John Wayne Gacy wore a clown suit for the same reason.
AUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!
Jeeze Louise, Salem, warn a body before posting such a picture! That picture cracked the glass on my monitor, as well as the window in my office! :))
"There is death in history, and it's not all rosebuds and memorial services. Mao, Fidel, Ho Chi Minh understood this."
Wow! It sure is nice when the enemy announces their presence in open court. A prime example of the thinking of the American Left, working hard for the destrucion of our country.
Well, Salem was the brave one that posted the monstrosity. As painful as it is to view, do note the picture of Castro on the wall.
Ahh, Gacy; another fine democrat. Horrible excuse for a human being, but then that's what makes up fine democrats these days.
Just messin' with the FReepers.
Me too. An extremely longgggggggg and uncomfortable one. Traitors deserve no less.
The enemy of my enemy is my friend. Way to go, lefties.
Very odd statement.
Where has anyone brought up a comparison of liberals on this thread? Where has anyone said one wrong is not as bad as another?
Maybe I misunderstood the point of your post?
The left's thinking always lacks logic.
And every filthy nightshirt wearing, fat bellied, bearded, flea ridden, useless arab male living on welfare who can claim to have read the terrorist manifesto (koran) - once he has gathered around himself a little group of nine or ten similar reprehensible scumbags, can call himself an imam and begin to plan jihad.
Allah wants us all dead. One 'cleric' stated that islam (sharia) would be established worldwide even if it meant the death of ALL human beings.
Plot to kill Howard
By KATIE LAPTHORNE
December 17, 2005
TERROR suspects talked chillingly about killing John Howard and his family as payback for the deaths of innocent Muslims, a court heard yesterday.
The conversation between accused would-be suicide bomber Abdulla Merhi and his spiritual leader Abdul Nacer Benbrika was covertly recorded in September last year.
The pair allegedly discussed taking "an eye for an eye" and how kafirs (non-believers) had taken over the world.
Merhi told the alleged leader of the Melbourne terror cell: "I want in on everything. If there is anything you talk to me, all right? I am not going to talk anymore."
The 20-year-old allegedly asked Benbrika how to respond if the Prime Minister was to cause the death of innocent Muslim families.
"Do we have to kill him and his family ... his people like at the football?" he said.
Benbrika replied: "If he kill our kids ... we kill (inaudible) little kids."
Prosecutor Nick Robinson said the pair spoke of committing violent jihad in the name of Allah and believed the doors of heaven would be opened to them for doing so.
Merhi said on the tape his eyes had recently been opened and a message had to be sent.
"I have made my point. If it comes up I will go but I am not waiting 20 years or two years," he said.
Benbrika said innocent ones could be the victims: "Because he kills our innocent ones ... that is it. An eye for an eye."
He also encouraged the younger man to do a "big thing" close to railway stations.
Mr Robinson said the conversation demonstrated the strength of the case against the men.
Magistrate Reg Marron said: "(The material) contains some disturbingly strong and reasonably assertive positions ... what they mean will no doubt become clear."
Merhi's barrister Robert Richter QC had argued the conversations were nothing more than thrashing out of theological issues, a claim dismissed by prosecutors.
"It is more than a religious discussion there is no doubt about that," Mr Robinson said.
"It is clearly about preparing ... for a violent jihad."
Merhi and his co-accused Hany Taha, 31, were yesterday denied bail for a second time. The duo were part of a group of 10 men charged last month with being a member of a terrorist organisation.
Eight of those men, including Merhi and Taha, also face a charge of funding a terrorist organisation.
The unnamed group allegedly plotted a violent jihad in Australia, ordering chemicals and discussing bomb-making.
Mr Marron said the case against the terror suspects was not overwhelmingly strong.
"It is a circumstantial case, it is an interpretive case, it involves many interpretations," he said.
Mr Marron said while he was concerned the men remained locked-up in Barwon Prison's high-security Acacia unit, they had not reached the threshold of exceptional circumstances.
They were remanded in custody to appear in court again in April.
SPIRITUAL ADVISOR? Benbrika
...at Guantanamo.
Bump.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.