Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tax-chick

Even worse, I bet delivery would have to be c section....but how about carrying? I bet damage is done to the cervix from the 'reconstruction' (what ever that is!).


144 posted on 01/11/2006 8:44:45 AM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies ]


To: Calpernia
I bet damage is done to the cervix from the 'reconstruction' (what ever that is!).

I would think that any surgery mucking about with the plumbing, as it were, would make it harder to carry a baby to term, as well as to deliver. Obviously, sometimes surgery is necessary to correct a real problem, and you weigh what's fixed against greater difficulties in childbearing (if you're planning on that :-).

Potential infection seems like a real problem with this type of surgery.

149 posted on 01/11/2006 8:48:15 AM PST by Tax-chick (D-minus-13.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson