Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'KILLER': I HAD COP OUTGUNNED
NY Post ^ | Jan. 11, 2006 | DENISE BUFFA

Posted on 01/11/2006 3:52:54 AM PST by Pharmboy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 last
To: absolootezer0
Speaking of semi-auto .357's...try one of these not well known but wonderful tools...too bad they are out of production =(...

...and I gotta say that they are a BLAST to shoot! They carry like a 1911. Getting a holster is a bit tricky, but Horshoe Leather in the UK (of all places!...go figger) custom hand-bones them (beautiful too!)

The balistics are hot too! Check it out.
http://www.dancoonan.com/coonan_ammo_accuracy_tests.html

81 posted on 01/11/2006 9:33:10 AM PST by woollyone (...a closed mouth gathers no feet...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: woollyone

uh...that's .357 magnum BTW


82 posted on 01/11/2006 9:34:53 AM PST by woollyone (...a closed mouth gathers no feet...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: SJSAMPLE

"In "Magnum Force", he explained to the vigilante/rookie cops that he used downloaded .44mags with wadcutters because they were more controllable. Probably just above .44 Special loads"

I think he just said it was a "light special". If he meant a lightly loaded 44 special that would be pretty weak. I interpret "light special" to mean a reduced 44 magnum load (probably handloaded) to improve controllability.


83 posted on 01/11/2006 9:37:22 AM PST by BadAndy (The DemocRATs are the enemy's most effective weapon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: eastforker

So did that 8.


84 posted on 01/11/2006 9:50:51 AM PST by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: absolootezer0

"i've seen load data showing 1800+ and 1900+fps respectively with 125gr jhp."

You are indeed correct about that loading data, however those velocities are so much higher than anything I have ever seen or experienced in reloading 357 mag cartridges that I am still skeptical. Their data for other calibers seems close to what I am familiar with. Only the 357 data seems out of line. For example, the velocities for the 110 grain bullet at 2040 from a 5.6 inch barrel is similar to a 121 gr bullet the from a 7.62X 39 SKS or AK47 rifle (~2100 fps).


85 posted on 01/11/2006 10:22:17 AM PST by BadAndy (The DemocRATs are the enemy's most effective weapon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Mini-14

"In fact, the 9 mm is a .36 caliber bullet compared to a .357 caliber bullet. "

Why is a .380 also referred to as to as a 9mm short?


86 posted on 01/11/2006 10:48:53 AM PST by School of Rational Thought (Republican - The thinking people's party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BadAndy

yep yep yep. .357 is an amazing cartridge that can seriously move. for a while i was using 16.5gr of 296 with a 158gr gdhp that i chrono'ed at over 1600fps. so i find it very possible that a 110gr can excede 2000fps safely.


87 posted on 01/11/2006 10:52:28 AM PST by absolootezer0 ("My God, why have you forsaken us.. no wait, its the liberals that have forsaken you... my bad")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
Allen maintains his age and deteriorating medical condition would make it cruel and unusual punishment for him to be executed.

No. The recoil momentum from the firing of the weapon is exactly equal and opposite to the projectile momentum, as is the momentum after striking the target. No load/mass combination that doesn't send the shooter back 10 feet can do it to the target, AND don't forget that the bullet loses a little energy in transit overcoming air resistance. Now if the shooter is a 300 lb. giant and the target is a 98 lb weakling, the target could be pushed back somewhat farther than the shooter, but 10 ft., no way.

88 posted on 01/11/2006 10:57:16 AM PST by Still Thinking (Disregard the law of unintended consequences at your own risk.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Puppage
Some vests (type 2 and above) protect against the 357 magnum And, yet my knife can cut right through it.

I'd like to see you try that. We had a EMS drill years ago with the local firearms instructor for the police. He propped an old level II against a wall and stabbed it as hard as he could with a folding knife. The blade penetrated about an eigth of an inch.
89 posted on 01/11/2006 2:46:36 PM PST by sig226
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

Yep--I get it now. While I wasn't a star in physics class, I didn't fail. You make complete sense...thanks.


90 posted on 01/11/2006 3:07:38 PM PST by Pharmboy (The stone age didn't end because they ran out of stones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

Yep--I get it now. While I wasn't a star in physics class, I didn't fail. You make complete sense...thanks.


91 posted on 01/11/2006 3:07:39 PM PST by Pharmboy (The stone age didn't end because they ran out of stones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: BadAndy
I may be wrong, but I don't believe you can get 2040 fps from a 110 gr 357 in a handgun barrel using standard loads

I would think not. The M1 Carbine launches a 110gr bullet at 1970 fps, and that's got a 18" barrel and 14.5 gr propellant (about twice the usual handgun load)

92 posted on 01/11/2006 5:15:41 PM PST by Oztrich Boy (Free Speech is not for everyone, If you don't like it, then don't use it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Tarpon

Typical muzzle data:

9mm (115gr JHP) 1225 fps 383 fp
.357mag (125gr JSP) 1370 fps 521 fp

but each cartride type has quite a few different bullet combinations and can vary in power quite a bit.

See:

http://winchester.com/products/catalog/handgundetail.aspx?symbol=WC3571&cart=MzU3IE1hZ251bQ==


93 posted on 01/13/2006 10:36:36 PM PST by Fido969 ("And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free" (John 8:32).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
Let's review the Laws of Physics as discovered by Sir Isaac Newton several hundred years ago:

The energy recieved cannot be more than the energy transmitted. So unless your 12 guage will knock the person firing it down, it won't knock the person the projectile(s) hit.

Period. End of story.

L

94 posted on 01/13/2006 10:42:50 PM PST by Lurker (You don't let a pack of wolves into the house just because they're related to the family dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Glock22

I get your point, but in the interest of accuracy, most S&W K and L frame revolvers come in either six or seven shot models.


95 posted on 01/13/2006 10:47:39 PM PST by Doohickey (If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice...I will choose freewill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BadAndy
Here's another arcane fact about the .44 mag (and .44 spcl for that matter), neither one of them are actually .44 caliber. Both projectiles are actually .429 in diameter.

But I guess .429 magnum just doesn't sound as scary.

I've been reloading for both the .44s for the last 10 years or so and I've never come across a manual that gives a 'light special' load using either .44 spcl or .44 mag brass.

I suppose you could try putting a special charge weight into a magnum case, but the only thing that would do is move the bullet a little closer to the forcing cone. It might also have some unknown pressure effects on the brass.

I personally wouldn't try it. I use .44 spcl brass for .44 spcl loads and magnum brass for magnum loads. Prudent reloaders don't mess around much with published load data. I know I don't. I like my fingers and eyes right where they are.

L

96 posted on 01/13/2006 10:51:24 PM PST by Lurker (You don't let a pack of wolves into the house just because they're related to the family dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: SJSAMPLE
They shot everything, including a pig carcass, and could not get any of the targets to do more than jerk a little.

Hit them right, and they'll drop pretty good, though. Particularly since the leftists took over, Hollywood has done a terrible job at portraying firearms. What bugs me more than the people flying around after getting shot are the guys shooting a weapon with a fifteen round clip three or four hundred rounds. I've looked all over for a silencer that will keep a .45 from making my ears ring, but I just can't find one.

97 posted on 01/13/2006 11:05:43 PM PST by Richard Kimball (How bout them Longhorns?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Fido969

I do most of my own reloading so I have plenty of manuals.


98 posted on 01/14/2006 3:33:29 AM PST by Tarpon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

"I've been reloading for both the .44s for the last 10 years or so and I've never come across a manual that gives a 'light special' load using either .44 spcl or .44 mag brass."

All manuals list a starting load and a maximum load. Loads significantly less than the maximum are often referred to as "light" by handloaders. Light can also refer to the bullet weight, as in using 180 gr instead of 240's to reduce penetration and recoil.

"I suppose you could try putting a special charge weight into a magnum case, but the only thing that would do is move the bullet a little closer to the forcing cone. It might also have some unknown pressure effects on the brass."

Any loads between the starting and maximum are generally considered safe in a gun in good condition. Changing the powder charge will not put the bullet closer to the forcing cone as the overall length of the cartridge will not change. The exception is a load way beyond maximum. In that case the pressure effects on the brass are predictable, and unfortunate.


99 posted on 01/14/2006 5:42:55 AM PST by BadAndy (The DemocRATs are the enemy's most effective weapon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: BadAndy
I meant that using the longer case would put the bullet closer to the forcing cone, not that the powder charge would do it.

Sorry for not being clearer.

L

100 posted on 01/14/2006 6:43:00 AM PST by Lurker (You don't let a pack of wolves into the house just because they're related to the family dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson