To: phantomworker
No one questions that the collapsing bubbles can (somehow) generate the temperatures for fusion. I'm not sure why; I merely note that such is not the dispute. People are having trouble replicating the claimed results and some people were surprised at being left out of the review process.
But, as despite the title, this isn't really "cold fusion." It's hot fusion in little collapsing bubbles.
43 posted on
01/11/2006 6:09:47 AM PST by
VadeRetro
(Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
To: VadeRetro
But, as despite the title, this isn't really "cold fusion. Maybe I am missing the point here. A science article is going to be published in a supposedly reputable journal, it cannot be replicated, there is a selective peer review, it is hot fusion and not cold fusion as the title suggests, and this is not a problem? I guess my research experience and striving for integrity in publications does not apply in this field. (Not trying to be sarcastic. LOL!)
44 posted on
01/11/2006 6:21:23 AM PST by
phantomworker
("Compared to what we ought to be, we are only half awake..." --William James)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson