Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: VadeRetro
But, as despite the title, this isn't really "cold fusion.

Maybe I am missing the point here. A science article is going to be published in a supposedly reputable journal, it cannot be replicated, there is a selective peer review, it is hot fusion and not cold fusion as the title suggests, and this is not a problem? I guess my research experience and striving for integrity in publications does not apply in this field. (Not trying to be sarcastic. LOL!)

44 posted on 01/11/2006 6:21:23 AM PST by phantomworker ("Compared to what we ought to be, we are only half awake..." --William James)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: phantomworker
Why is it not being "cold fusion" a problem? The article's title actually says "desktop fusion," not "cold fusion" anyway.

There is skepticism of Taleyarkhan's results, yes. People who have expressed same regarding earlier Taleyarkhan studies were disappointed at not being in the peer review process this time, yes.

46 posted on 01/11/2006 6:44:46 AM PST by VadeRetro (Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson