Replies

Perhaps it's pointing out the obvious truth that women are more physically attractive to men looking for wives when they're in 20's and early 30's then they are thereafter?

I guess if you want to castigate basic male biology as "women bashing" and "hatred," you can, but it's not going to accomplish much. Feminist rhetoric won't change male biology.

My wife feels the need to point out (via my post) that men are most attractive in their 20's and 30's as well. She says that any 20 year old claims that she's dating a 40 year old for any reason other than security is a liar.

As a man who is about to marry for the second time, both my ex and my current wife-to-be are over 40. Both have kept themselves in shape and are attractive. As a man, it was the outward appearance of both of these women that initially attracted me. Both of them were seeking someone who made them feel secure and outward appearance meant little to them (thank God!)

Men want looks, women want security. Thus Anna Nicole marries a geezer.

Call me a hater or basher, but a slim figure and attractive face is what does it for me. I don't care if she flips burgers at Sonic. If a woman has doubled her body weight since her 20th birthday, cut her hair shorter than mine and has a uni-brow, I simply do not wish to engage in an intimate relationship with her.

Because of that, I am an objectifying pig. OK, fine. Blame your lack of personal self control and lack of femininity on me all you want...but it still wont get you a date.

Is it any wonder why most feminists are fat ugly women who find it easier to hate and be bitter than to make themselves attractive for men?

If I had no job and lived with my mom would I be right to be bitter towards women because they wouldn't date a loser like that? Isn't that a bit of a double standard?