European Face-Off For Early Farmers

A new analysis of modern and ancient human skulls supports the idea that early farmers in the Middle East spread into Europe between 11,000 and 6,500 years ago, intermarried with people there, and passed on their agricultural way of life to the native Europeans.

C. Loring Brace of the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor and his colleagues compared 24 measurements for each of 1,282 skulls from current and prehistoric populations in Europe, the Middle East, and sub-Saharan Africa. The sample included 201 skulls from early farmers and 219 skulls from Bronze Age people, who lived between 4,300 and 2,700 years ago.

Modern populations from Scandinavia to the Middle East display close genetic links, reflected in skull similarities, Brace's team reports in the Jan. 3 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Ancient farmers and their Bronze Age successors share many skull features but display a considerably weaker anatomical link to modern Europeans, especially in northern regions, the researchers say.

These results fit a scenario in which farming spread into Europe via population mixing rather than by natives simply adopting agriculture the investigators propose. They say that facial traits of early immigrants have become diluted through intermarriage.

Thanks Blam.

To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list. Thanks.

Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on or off the
"Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list or GGG weekly digest
-- Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)

Two possible examples come to mind..

As far as scandinavia is concerned, the Laplanders.. ( Saami ? ).. those reindeer guys...
Another good possibility is northern Siberia... ( not sure if one would classify them as "russian indians" or "russian aboriginals" but they seem to have the tribal, hunter gatherer type of structure.. )

I would go a little farther and speculate that any "original" expansion of farmers or agriculture probably didn't go much farther north than the caucasian mountain ranges..
It doesn't make much sense for farmers to expand into an area with longer, harsher winters..
The logical move would be East and West, with the western expansion then moving north along the Atlantic coastline, where ocean currents and trade winds would modify the climate to something more hospitable..

It may have taken several later "expansions" or a gradual filtering of general trade and emigrations to the north over a couple ( or several ) thousands of years to effect change to farming farther north..
Necessity would have to overcome convenience..

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.