Posted on 01/09/2006 8:55:56 AM PST by kiriath_jearim
Dutch cannabis policy challenged
The Dutch have long been famous for their tolerant attitude to cannabis.
But now they are re-examining their approach, because millions of European "drugs tourists" are heading to the Netherlands to do what they cannot do at home, the BBC's Mike Donkin reports.
They flood in across the border from Germany and Belgium, along with the international criminal gangs who operate the drug supply lines.
Maastricht's citizens want an end to this, the city's Mayor Gerd Leers says. So he has called for the Dutch and the rest of Europe to adopt a common "pragmatic approach" to soft drugs.
Mayor Leers has told the Dutch parliament that the licensing system that allows coffee shops to sell 5g of cannabis to each customer should be extended, to allow them to grow their own plants.
"They should have a permit to grow their own cannabis so that they can cut their ties with the criminals," the mayor says. "That way we can control things. At the moment our system is so hypocritical."
'Back-door problem'
Jaap Louwerier, owner of The Fantaisie in Amsterdam, agrees with that. His coffee shop is popular with customers who come to the city for the weekend from France, Britain, Ireland and elsewhere to buy cannabis. "This is all quite legal," he says.
"But it is illegal for me to buy the bigger and bigger stocks of cannabis I need to supply these smokers. And the law says I can only keep up to 500 grammes on my premises, which is not enough. In the coffee shops we call this the 'back-door problem'."
In a dim corridor behind the shop, he covertly buys a stash of cannabis from a supplier, while keeping an eye on the door.
"If the police came in now they would confiscate all this," he says. "That's happened once already, and if it happened three times, I'd lose my licence."
Illegal plantations have sprung up across the Netherlands to supply the coffee shops - in outhouses, basements and attics.
What are these secret gardens like? In one old apartment, a bedroom floor is covered with plastic sheeting and earth, and orange lights provide artificial sunlight above a mini-forest of lush green plants.
Health warning
For many poorer families in the Netherlands, cannabis cultivation has become a tempting way to make some extra cash. There have been prosecutions, but only a handful.
Dutch scientists have warned, however, of the health dangers from this cottage industry.
At a drugs institute in Utrecht, which carries out research for the government, Harald Wychgel hands me samples collected from the coffee shops - fresh hashish and fat, pre-rolled joints.
"It's not clear how any of this is produced," he says. "So you don't know how strong it is - whether it's mild or very strong cannabis - or whether pesticides have been used on the plants.
"You cannot be sure what you are smoking. And with drugs it is always safest to know for sure."
Tough stance
Right-wing politicians in the Netherlands say that drugs tourism, and the contradictions this has revealed in the cannabis laws, show that liberalisation has had its day. They oppose the Maastricht mayor's call for coffee shops to be given growers' licences.
"That would only mean more drugs tourists and encourage the criminals," says Christian Democrat MP Cisca Joldersma.
Amsterdam coffee shop smokers see no immediate threat She wants most of the coffee shops to be closed down and a different sort of licence to be issued - an identity card for Dutch cannabis users, so that foreigners would be kept out of the shops that remained.
"The drugs market is a global market," Mrs Joldersma says. "So we cannot have our liberal policy in isolation."
She says the Netherlands must get tougher on soft drugs. "We want one strong European policy, which the Netherlands has to adopt."
Mayor Leers says that would mean throwing away a drugs policy which has been shown to work, for the sake of uniformity. He wants all of Europe to treat cannabis as tolerantly as the Dutch, eliminating drugs tourism, and has summoned fellow civic leaders from other nations to a conference to tell them the advantages that would bring.
"If you look at the figures you can see that only a small percentage of the youth in the Netherlands is addicted to cannabis. In Germany, Belgium and France the figures are much higher," the mayor says. "So our policy works. It is a good policy."
Back in The Fantaisie, the music and the mood are mellow in the smoke. Erick, a Dutch customer, thinks there is no way his government can put the clock back and criminalise cannabis again.
"If they make it illegal, the coffee shops will just go underground, like in the rest of Europe. I mean people haven't stopped smoking there. They can ban cannabis, but they won't stop people smoking."
Guess I won't be going to Holland after all.
No more "Dutch Treat"?
I just go to see the tulips on the dykes........
Spoken like a true socialist.
We can do that with alcohol. It's not a perfect system, and there are implementation problems that exist, however it's at least reasonably enforcable.
How do you do this with marijuana?
Give me a solid answer to that backed up with scientific facts, and I would be unlikely to oppose the legalization of marijuana. I might even support it as a better recreational drug than alcohol.
The answer to failed socialist policy is more socialism?
Didn't mean to ignore your thoughtful comment. I've been busy at work. I'll give it more thought, then comment. Thanks.
Legally impaired should be based on reaction time, not which drug you are taking.
A person that cannot react because of age or cold medicine is just as dangerous as a pot smoker.
Valid questions which I know not the answer to.
To relieve your anxiety a bit - marijuana is a mild stimulant and the user is more cognizant of his/her impaired condition than the alcohol user might be. I think the main cause of alcohol related auto accidents is alcohol coupled with sleepiness.
I'm not advocating driving while impaired by any means.
Not that simple.
Drugs often effect your ability to concentrate more than your reaction time. You may be able to react quickly, but simply be unaware that you need to react until it's too late.
So how do you reliably, quickly, and simply test that at a traffic stop. It needs to be a solid testing method that will stand up in court, not something that depends on subjective interpretation. A test that is subjective will lead to both real criminals beating the system and abuses by some policen (small minority).
A person that cannot react because of age or cold medicine is just as dangerous as a pot smoker.
I agree. How do you test that?
I smoked it once upon a time. I do not anymore, but I'm quite aware of it's effect. Good weed can definately get you messed up enough that you can't hope to opperate a motor vehicle safely. With crappy weed, you could smoke an ounce and drive just fine.
For me it is easier to moderate my alcohol usage and maintain a nice mellow feeling while remaining in control of my actions.
I don't smoke it anymore. I don't reccomend anyone else smoking it. I don't think it should be legalized unless imparement can be quantatatively measured in some reliable way?
Is someone opperating a moror vehicle while impared? Was some other kind of accident effected by imparement? I believe it's illegal to be in the possession of a firearm while impared in some states at least, how can you tell accurately, or are you supposed to give up your right to keep and bear arms if you smoked weed in the last 24 hours?
These kinds of questions need to be answered before such a drug is made legal. The really need to be answered even if it is kept illegal if they can be answered.
I agree. How do you test that?
The time from a flashing light to pressing a button?
Typical liberal, socialist stupidity...let them smoke pot but not grow it and then wonder why criminals are everywhere.
Roadside sobriety tests: walking a line, etc.
Even if it doesn't, it gets the stoned driver off the road that night.
I've been advised by an attorney to decline any roadside sobriety tests. There's no downside to refusing, if they have probable cause to make you give a breathalyzer they will, otherwise they're just trolling for probable cause.
It's the same thing as allowing a search without a warrant.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.