It's not tough if you actually *use* reason, and not multiple fallacies and misrepresentations and errors. Feel free to improve your presentation.
By the way, did you read my article called The Myth of the Blind Watchmaker at http://RussP.us/Dawkins.htm ?
Yes, but I stopped after the tenth error. It's not as pathetic as the average anti-evolution screed, but it doesn't even rise to the level of a competent effort.
If it were presented in a college-level biology class, it would earn no higher than a C-, at best.
"By the way, did you read my article called The Myth of the Blind Watchmaker at http://RussP.us/Dawkins.htm ?"
"Yes, but I stopped after the tenth error. It's not as pathetic as the average anti-evolution screed, but it doesn't even rise to the level of a competent effort."
Oh. And what prey tell were those ten errors?
Who do you think you're fooling?