Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Navy chaplain ends hunger strike after 18 days - Claims service changed its policy are disputed
Stars and Stripes ^ | January 8, 2006 | Leo Shane III

Posted on 01/09/2006 5:32:52 AM PST by Former Military Chick

WASHINGTON — The Navy chaplain who had pledged a hunger strike until rules were changed to allow him “to pray publicly in Jesus’ name” broke his 18-day fast Saturday, calling his protest a victory for religious liberty.

Navy officials said they made no policy changes since the start of his fast, and disputed charges that he would have been dismissed if not for his public protest.

But Navy Chaplain (Lt.) Gordon Klingenschmitt said he was on the verge of losing his commission before he began the hunger strike and said he believes the Navy changed its policy to keep him in the service.

The chaplain had received poor reviews from his commander prior to the latest protest, which he believed were the precursor to his dismissal.

Along with that complaint, Klingenschmitt took issue with Defense Department rules mandating nonspecific language in public, nondenominational events, and an order from superior officers prohibiting him from wearing his uniform during television appearances related to his protest.

Klingenschmitt had asked for the president to sign an executive order overruling those restrictions, but said a Navy memo affirming his right to wear his uniform in certain public events and use Christian-specific language during certain instances satisfied his protest goals.

“Today the Navy has reluctantly obeyed the law, to grant me the religious liberty I always should’ve had,” he said during a prayer rally outside the White House on Saturday.

The memo sent to Klingenschmitt specifies that sailors cannot wear their uniforms for media appearances without prior approval from command, but are permitted to do so for any legitimate worship services.

Navy officials said it is not a change in policy, and Klingenschmitt was not given a blanket order not to wear his uniform in public.

Officials also said that Klingenschmitt all along has been an active-duty sailor in good standing, with no disciplinary action pending, and has not received any punishment for language used in public forums.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: chaplain; dod; klingenschmitt
I do not buy a word this man says.
1 posted on 01/09/2006 5:32:55 AM PST by Former Military Chick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick
1) The navy would not change it's policy to retain 1 officer.
2) When I was in the Navy, and went to catholic mass, the chaplain used Jesus's name as often as the mass required.
3)The poor reviews were probably earned.
4)If he was about to lose his commission, then this was nothing but a publicity stunt, and he should lose his commission immediately
2 posted on 01/09/2006 5:39:19 AM PST by joe fonebone (Thin skinned people make me sick!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BelegStrongbow; McGavin999; Squantos; Windsong; Lancey Howard; Cboldt; SteveMcKing; ...

Update PING

Still something seems mighty odd with this story.


3 posted on 01/09/2006 5:39:40 AM PST by Former Military Chick (I salute all our Vets, those who walked before me and all those who walk after me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

Why?


4 posted on 01/09/2006 5:40:12 AM PST by icwhatudo (The rino borg...is resistance futile?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joe fonebone

Yeah, this guy seems to be a publicity whore. Anyone with the least bit of brains knows that the Navy, and other services, are changed/subverted quietly from within.

This sea-lawyer should have shutup, done 40 years, become an admiral and called the shots and changed policy to the degree that he could within the scope of his power.


5 posted on 01/09/2006 5:44:53 AM PST by ExpatGator (Progressivism: A polyp on the colon politic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

This guy is lying through his teeth about what the Navy is doing to him.


6 posted on 01/09/2006 5:49:01 AM PST by Lunatic Fringe (North Texas Solutions http://ntxsolutions.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

Why's that. The Air Force doesn't allow the name of Jesus to be used in prayers at the academy.
Our Sec.Def. doesn't have the guts to correct this discrimination against Christians, nor does the President.


7 posted on 01/09/2006 5:51:15 AM PST by em2vn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

This guy is an idiot. Every evening prayer aboard the ships I was on was ended with "amen" in deference to the entire crew. Chaplains can pray however they want when they're conducting services appropriate to their own religion on Sundays (or Fridays for the Jewish faith).


8 posted on 01/09/2006 6:34:37 AM PST by USNA74
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USNA74

You're correct, and writing with common sense. Stay tuned...someone will be along to insult you shortly.


9 posted on 01/09/2006 7:07:29 AM PST by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ExpatGator

If you have not read recently, the Left went on a major push to control religion in the military claiming Christians were too uppity. They got reaction to their protests in the brass.

I respect this guy's protest back. It probably has made the brass leery of knee jerk support for the lefties' demand for speech/Christian control in the military. If you don't push back, you lose. Christians need to push back.


10 posted on 01/09/2006 8:07:21 AM PST by Galveston Grl (Getting angry and abandoning power to the Democrats is not a choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Galveston Grl

I understand what you are saying, and do not disagree with your characterization of the lefts' attack on religion in the military.

What I do disagree with is the martyr manuever and statements made by this United States Naval Officer. He is first and foremost responsible to the NAVY and to those in the Navy who will be impacted by his methods. He wears the uniform and is responsible for conducting himself in a professional manner. He has failed in this regard. He is a danger to good order and discipline and should be jettisoned from the fantail during a high-speed run.


11 posted on 01/09/2006 1:22:31 PM PST by ExpatGator (Progressivism: A polyp on the colon politic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ExpatGator
"Yeah, this guy seems to be a publicity whore."

That seems about right.
12 posted on 01/09/2006 3:47:10 PM PST by Ninian Dryhope ("Bush lied, people dyed. Their fingers." The inestimable Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson