Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House Members Worried over Cunningham Wire Report
NewsMax.com ^ | 9 January 2006 | Paul Rodriguez and Anthony Kimery,

Posted on 01/08/2006 8:39:21 PM PST by Aussie Dasher

Top Republicans in the House are buzzing - and scrambling - at news alleging that Randy "Duke" Cunningham, a former San Diego congressman who's pled guilty to bribery and other illegal activities, was wearing a wire for the FBI during the summer and early fall of 2005.

The undercover operation, according to senior Justice and federal law enforcement, is part of a broadening investigation into the Jack Abramoff bribes-for-favors scandal now roiling Washington.

The disgraced former lawmaker initially began cooperating with federal investigators after they uncovered evidence of his illegal acceptance of bribes in cash and luxury items from at least two small California defense contractors.

Cunningham began cooperating shortly after announcing last summer that he would not run again for Congress and before his November 28, 2005, plea agreement. Court documents reveal he admitted to accepting nearly $2 million in graft money for political favors.

The former Vietnam flying ace and war hero was later brought into the burgeoning Abramoff probe because of his position as a member of Congress with unique access to other Congressmen under scrutiny by a joint Justice Department Public Integrity investigation.

"Cunningham wore a wire on the Hill during meetings with, and meetings set up with, other lawmakers Abramoff was interested in talking to or meeting," a high level federal law enforcement source said without elaborating party affiliations of the targeted lawmakers.

It could not be immediately determined whether Abramoff or others were or are part of the undercover eavesdropping operation involving Cunningham.

"You can assume any private meeting Cunningham had with legislators pertaining to Abramoff were recorded," the high-level federal law enforcement source said. "It does not mean [these lawmakers] are under investigation. But some are. There will be repercussions"

"This will go up the food chain," the source added ominously, implying Cunningham's wire may have ensnared Congressional leaders.

Over eighty members and congressional staff are, according to a senior Senate investigator, under scrutiny for political kickbacks, bribes, and political favors on behalf of Abramoff. The scandal is said to include lobbyists, political operatives in Washington and a number of government officials including high-level aides.

The result of whatever cooperation Cunningham provided has, according to the high-level federal law enforcement official, is that specific legislation is being closely scrutinized to find Abramoff's fingerprints on legislative action as part of his bribes-for-favors criminal activities.

The high-level federal law enforcement source implied other members of Congress are directly implicated.

"Interpret as you will," the source said.

"There will be a leak investigation on this, too. If there are further leaks it could jeopardize on-going investigations developed from the taps."

Carl Forti, communications director for the National Republican Congressional Committee, sent an urgent email to all House Republicans late January 6, 2006, alerting lawmakers and top GOP staff to a breaking story by Time magazine's online news site with the following headline: "Disgraced Congressman 'Wore a Wire'"

The TIME article, by former Roll Call reporter Tim Burger, says Cunningham began cooperating with federal authorities shortly after he announced in the summer that he was resigning. The magazine's online story does not provide any specifics on the alleged wire caper. [Editor's Note: journalist Paul Rodriguez was tipped off to Cunningham's "wire" over three weeks ago but at the request of a top federal government official withheld initial publication because it would have seriously compromised an ongoing and "sensitive" criminal investigation involving Abramoff and others. The TIME magazine article made the confidentiality pledge moot.]

Capitol Hill leaders, as far as can be determined, were unaware of Cunningham's secret spying operations, including at meetings at the Armed Services Committee, with staff and others.

Capitol Hill Shocked

Several members of Congress were both shocked and angry at hearing the news. Rumors have been flying recently that up to a dozen members of Congress are tied in to the Abramoff scandal.

With news of Cunningham's informant role leaking, many members in the House Republican Conference are quite worried where the corruption probes will go next.

"I'm glad I didn't talk with that son of a bitch," said one senior GOP lawmaker who has heard rumors in the members' dining room and in the Republican cloakroom just off the floor of the House about the wire.

"Word is that Duke was not working alone [on getting sweet heart deals from some defense contractors] and this tells me [on top of the Abramoff breaking news] that it's worse than we thought."

The House Intelligence Committee, led by Chairman Pete Hoekstra and co-chair Jane Harmon, has launched its own separate investigation into the Cunningham affair as a result of the former congressman's membership on the panel.

House Armed Services Committee Chairman Duncan Hunter, a close friend of Cunningham, has indicated he is willing to probe any links between Cunningham and the panel's work. To date, Hunter has not formally launched such an investigation.

A senior Capitol Hill official, speaking on condition of anonymity, told NewsMax, "Holy sh-t! This is going to rock the place. Duke knew everybody and cut deals all the time."

This same official said that it was doubtful that Justice Department and FBI officials would have told congressional leadership or the Capitol Police given the sensitivity of the probe.

"I can tell you this though, it's going to cause a major ruckus with the leadership that a secret probe was going on under their noses and they were not informed," the Capitol Hill source said.

Federal probes of Capitol Hill activities are not new.

It was 15 years ago that a joint Postal Inspection Service and FBI probe was launched on Capitol Hill to investigate allegations of corruption involving employees of the House Post Office. That probe, which Capitol Police had initially conducted but then felt was stymied by congressional leaders and turned over to the FBI, ultimately resulted in the conviction of nearly two dozen Congressional staff and notably the then Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dan Rostenkowski.

In all, the House Post Office scandal led to the resignation and defeat of nearly 100 members of Congress and helped propel the Republican takeover of the House in 1994. At the time, the Post Office scandal was paralleled by the House Bank check-kiting scandal.

The Abramoff scandal has been played in the mainstream press as mostly a Republican-tied debacle.

But its tentacles continue to draw in many Democrats, including leadership lawmakers who received gifts and donations from the lobbyist, his associates, and his clients.

Who or what information was caught on the federal wires that Cunningham provided -- from physically wearing a wire, to phone intercepts and electronic monitoring of meetings through other means - is unknown.

But speculation among GOP lawmakers, federal law enforcement officials and lobbyists (some of whom have been contacted by the FBI) is that several close friends of Cunningham were unknowingly caught in incriminating conversations.

"This is huge," one lawmaker exclaimed who has heard the rumors of Cunningham's secret wire-related activities. "Several of us were warned to steer clear of him on the advice of friends."

A Justice Department spokesman in Washington, D.C., declined to answer any questions about the allegations of Cunningham cooperating with a federal electronics sting-type operation.

Calls to the U.S. attorney's office in San Diego were not immediately returned.

Rep. Bob Ney, an Ohio Republican and chairman of the House Administration Committee, is alleged to be a target of the Abramoff investigators. NewsMax has learned that several of his top staff both in Washington and in Ohio has been subpoenaed for records.

Ney has denied any wrongdoing involving Abramoff despite being identified as "Representative #1" who accepted financial favors from the former lobbyists.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 109th; capitolhill; corruption; dukecunningham; fbi; gop; housemembers; moneywhores; ney; puckerfactor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-148 next last
To: Echo Talon
Put a wire on a Democrat and lets see what kind of tangled web we weave.

Between this and Abramoff maybe we can clean out a whole lot of congress and start over. I'm thoroughly sick of all of them.

61 posted on 01/08/2006 10:22:34 PM PST by Dianna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: dk/coro
If you want to talk about heroes, speak of Jerry Denton and Jim Stockdale

Real American Heroes!
.
62 posted on 01/08/2006 10:25:04 PM PST by mugs99 (Don't take life too seriously, you won't get out alive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
Congressman A: "We need to investigate all these sneak-n-peak activities the administration is doing, along with the illegal wiretaps. The public doesn't like what they've seen in the press and I am afraid the USA PATRIOT Act will not be renewed unless we show our concern with the Fourth Amendment being violated."

Congressman B: "No we don't. We're at war. The government needs these tools to root out the terrorists. Besides, if you've done nothing wrong you've got nothing to worry about."

Congressman A: "Well, I dunno. We've all done something wrong sometime, doncha think? I don't want my private phone conversations, especially talking with my fellow members, being monitored and maybe used for political purposes."

Congressman B: "There's absolutely nothing to worry about. None of us are criminals. Besides, the Justice Department knows better than go after members of Congress who've done nothing wrong. But if they did, they must know we're honorable people. It's not like when an ordinary crook gets caught and then tries to deny it. No, members of Congress are honorable. When presented with the evidence, we'd admit our wrongdoing right away and save all that expense for the taxpayers. An honorable person always takes responsibility and never tries to shift the blame . ."

Clean-cut FBI agent, approaching the pair: "Uh, excuse me, Congressmen. I wonder if you'd be so kind as to answer a few questions? Are either of you familiar with a gentleman named "Duke" Cunningham?"

63 posted on 01/08/2006 10:31:46 PM PST by logician2u
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

So you can use a Wire to ensnare Americans, but not tap phone calls to al queda members...


64 posted on 01/08/2006 10:33:51 PM PST by demsux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iscool

cunningham was not on anyone's list of rinos until he went bad, then all of a sudden he is a rino.


65 posted on 01/08/2006 10:40:07 PM PST by staytrue (MOONBAT conservatives are those who would rather lose to a liberal than support a moderate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon
So you trust McCain, Hagel, Lugar and Chafee?

I trust they will not do what cunningham has done. I trust that they will do what they think is right for the country. I may have a different opinion on what is right, but I'm sure they will not be in the abramhoff or cunningham scandals. And I include Collins, Dole, Spector, Hatch and Voinivich too. Dewine I'm not so sure about.

66 posted on 01/08/2006 10:44:12 PM PST by staytrue (MOONBAT conservatives are those who would rather lose to a liberal than support a moderate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile
Reading this article, I can almost guess that the reporter they referred to actually held to the "confidentiality agreement" and they were disappointed. They didn't expect it, hoping that they could gripe about the leak, but there was no releasing of the leak, so they went to Time.

The fact is, bribery is very hard to prove. If the Podunk Indians donate a million bucks to your campaign and then go to your office and give a tearful presentation on their plight and you write a nice letter about them, it's not necessarily a quid pro quo. If they can prove that it is, then it's bribery and it's a crime.

The most likely scenario is that Ney and maybe one or two others will be kicked out of Congress for accepting "illegal" gifts, a violation of House rules.

But if all of the money is campaign donations, I see nothing happening here.

67 posted on 01/08/2006 10:50:30 PM PST by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: dk/coro
Feel your pain...but, for a couple of hours in combat the guy, and his back seat, were what most people would call heroes.. I would. A hard handle, for most people, to live with...And for better or worse, forty years down the line, we're not the same guys we were... Ch/Eng.(shot at and missed, sh;t at and hit) 1St MAW, Danang 65-66
68 posted on 01/08/2006 11:17:25 PM PST by ChEng
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Polybius
What's sad about it. He made his choices. He broke the law. He allowed his morals to be auctioned off to the highest bidder. He deserves what he gets. I see no difference in this and treason. He sold out the Constitution that he defended with his life for money. I hope he and all the rest of the 535 bribe takers in Congress go down.
69 posted on 01/09/2006 12:06:42 AM PST by unseen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon
Term limits??? yes 2 terms as a congressman, and 2 terms as a Senator thats 16 years of feeding at the trough that's enough for anyone. And if they are lucky two for president that is 24 years. If you can't due want you want in 24 years time you need to get off the pot and give someone else a try!!
70 posted on 01/09/2006 12:09:37 AM PST by unseen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: pawdoggie
Agreed this goes beyond party line. This is our country at stake. We either need to clean up D.C or enjoy are children growing up in a unfree country because these criminals are selling our rights down the drain to the highest bidders be it the Chinese, the industry captains, the special interest groups everyone gets something except the American people....no wait they get the shaft.
71 posted on 01/09/2006 12:13:58 AM PST by unseen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile
I would be surprised to find 1 out of the 535 members of Congress clean. So me a clean politician and I'll show you a unicorn.
72 posted on 01/09/2006 12:16:42 AM PST by unseen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

CEO's, stock traders and brokers, and others have been found guilty of crimes and sent to prison, but I have yet to see a politician that has committed a crime go to jail and I will venture here that whom ever in congress or senate that is found to be guilty of a crime will not, repeat, will not go to jail or behind any bars. There will always be a DEAL made of some kind.
Another thing that I think the political folks in Washington, D.C. believe is that the river flow of dollars will and can not ever have an end to it. I say this because of the way they are always looking for a way to spent money and not any way to give back or take less money away from the U.S. citizens.


73 posted on 01/09/2006 1:31:33 AM PST by AIC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
Nobody panic! We'll get Barrett to investigate this. Then after 10 years, his report will get 'neutered' of any damaging details.
74 posted on 01/09/2006 4:16:42 AM PST by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

WHAT!!! I thought that a warrant was needed to listen in on conversations with all American citizens in America.


75 posted on 01/09/2006 5:34:15 AM PST by norwaypinesavage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AIC
I have yet to see a politician that has committed a crime go to jail ...

Trafficant

76 posted on 01/09/2006 5:35:48 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile
You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy than D.C.

What about Mos Eisley spaceport?

77 posted on 01/09/2006 5:35:49 AM PST by Uncle Vlad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: norwaypinesavage
WHAT!!! I thought that a warrant was needed to listen in on conversations with all American citizens in America.

I bet Cunningham's wire was done after obtaining a warrant.

78 posted on 01/09/2006 5:36:39 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon
When people start whining about NSA monitoring of American citizen's conversations with terrorists abroad, they forget the Clintons broke the law in the glare of broad daylight. Nobody bothered to question them: Travelgate, 900 FBI files, Chinagate, using the IRS to go after personal enemies like Elizabeth Ward Gracen, Elian Gonzalez, Waco, Ruby Ridge...

The point is, the Clintons aren't concerned about what is legal and what is against the the law--they were surrounded by enough enablers on both sides of the aisle who would let them get away with it.
79 posted on 01/09/2006 5:39:50 AM PST by Uncle Vlad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt
"I bet Cunningham's wire was done after obtaining a warrant."

A warrant that specifically names each individual he is going to talk to?

80 posted on 01/09/2006 5:43:34 AM PST by norwaypinesavage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-148 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson