[SirLinksalot]

<<<<
No, it isn't, because it's easy to identify the errors and false claims that Woodmorappe makes. You don't have to just flip a coin and decie which "expert" to believe, you can examine the strength of their claims yourself, and find out who knows what he's talking about and who's incompetent and/or dishonest. Woodmorappe, like almost every "creation scientist", has been caught screwing up, and misrepresenting sources, countless times over the years:
>>>>

Of course Woodmorappe has not remained silent and has responded to the critics with his own rebuttals as in here :

Misuse of Woodmorappe’s List Of Discrepant Isotopic Dates

http://www.trueorigin.org/ca_jw_02.asp

and here :

http://www.trueorigin.org/ca_jw_01.asp

[Ichneumon]

Of course Woodmorappe has not remained silent and has responded to the critics with his own rebuttals as in here :

...with the usual hand-waving and inadequate excuses. The "quality" of Woodmorappe's "rebuttal" can be seen in the following passage:

It is a pitiful sight to behold my sisters and brothers in Christ, such as Schimmrich, blindly believe and defend humanistic ideas and premises with such intensity and abject servility. It reminds me of SOME of the Christian pacificists of WWII, who were absolutely blind to all of Hitler's crimes while constantly hurling venom against the Allies for their "unChristian" attitudes and conduct.

When the facts on your side, pound on the facts. When the facts are not on your side, as they clearly aren't in Woodmorappe's case, try to hysterically slur the people who point out the errors in your argument...

Here's the response to Woodmorappe's attempted rebuttal.