Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CarolinaGuitarman

<<<<
Just a little info for you. Coyoteman works with carbon dating on a regular (weekly) basis. You have been warned, though a little too late to help you. :)
>>>.

So does John Woodamorpe. So I guess it is one expert's opinion against another.


102 posted on 01/10/2006 7:18:44 AM PST by SirLinksalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]


To: SirLinksalot; Coyoteman
[Just a little info for you. Coyoteman works with carbon dating on a regular (weekly) basis. You have been warned, though a little too late to help you. :) ]

So does John Woodamorpe. So I guess it is one expert's opinion against another.

No, it isn't, because it's easy to identify the errors and false claims that Woodmorappe makes. You don't have to just flip a coin and decie which "expert" to believe, you can examine the strength of their claims yourself, and find out who knows what he's talking about and who's incompetent and/or dishonest. Woodmorappe, like almost every "creation scientist", has been caught screwing up, and misrepresenting sources, countless times over the years:

Geochronology kata John Woodmorappe

How Good Are Those Young-Earth Arguments? Additional Topics: Woodmorappe's list of "bad" dates

How Can Woodmorappe Sell Us a Bill of Goods if He Doesn't Know the Costs?

Dr Kevin R. Henke exposes John Woodmorappe's fraudulent attacks on radiometric dating and reveals other creationist misrepresentations

Hiding the Numbers to Defame Radiometric Dating: A Few Examples of the Many Misused References in Woodmorappe (1999)

More Classic Misquotations in Woodmorappe (1999)


114 posted on 01/10/2006 8:20:27 AM PST by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson