Manmohan offered to quit over CPM protest to Indo-US exercise (India PM)

Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had offered to resign last November when West Bengal Chief Minister Buddhadeb Bhattacharya refused to provide his government's support to the India-United States joint military exercise in West Bengal.

Not only did he offer to resign but he also told Bhattacharya that 'defence matters decided by the Centre can't be overruled by the states.' Dr Singh also gave the West Bengal CM the example of Kerala where Indo-China joint military exercises were conducted unhindered. According to a source in New Delhi, "The PM said no state can deny defence exercises." Dr Singh also issued a stern warning that the Centre can impose President's rule if a state does not cooperate in the country's defence matters.

He made these remarks during a telephone conversation with Bhattacharya, which took place before the exercise.

"The prime minister shows guts when a major issue related to America comes up," a senior government official in New Delhi said.

After his conversation with Bhattacharya, the Cabinet Committee on Security met and passed a resolution that states have to cooperate on defence matters.

The impact of Singh's strong stand was so intense that Prakash Karat, general secretary of the Communist Party of India-Marxist, met the prime minister the next morning and promised all-out cooperation for the Indo-US joint exercise.

Belying his soft exterior, Prime Minister Singh can turn into a man of steel even against his allies if he feels their policies or actions could threaten the national interest and prestige.

In this case, what angered him was that his commitment and belief to take the US on board in his strategic vision for India was being obstructed by the CPI-M, which rules West Bengal. That state's Marxist activists threatened to launch a massive agitation against the defence exercise.

India and the US conducted the six-day joint air exercise on November 7 at the Kalaikunda air force station in West Midnapore district.

But that was made possible only after Dr Singh handled the situation firmly, to the surprise of his colleagues.

Very few people in government know the prime minister had offered to resign, but only after sending a message that in India's federal structure, a commitment given by the Centre is binding on the states.

The schedule for the exercise had been drawn up by the military officers of the two countries in pursuance of the agreement for bilateral strategic cooperation reached during the earlier National Democratic Alliance government.

Joint exercises in pursuance of this agreement had been held before in other parts of India to the mutual benefit of the two countries.

When it was West Bengal's turn to conduct the exercise, the state CPI-M mounted an agitation and threatened to oppose the defence initiative through mass mobilisation of party workers, thereby creating fears about the smooth conduct of the exercise and the physical security of the visiting American officers and troops.

When Bhattacharya, toeing the state CPI-M line, also started sending out negative signals, Dr Singh called up the chief minister.

Instead of shifting the venue outside West Bengal, the prime minister put his foot down and insisted that the state government ensure there was no obstruction to the exercise because it has a bearing on national prestige.

The prime minister's polite, but stern, message and his reminder to the chief minister of the latter's obligations under the Constitution was a historical political move which went unnoticed.

Following this, Bhattacharya asked the state police to take firm security measures for the exercise.

An effigy of US President George W Bush and a copy of the India-US defense framework were burnt. Local Left leaders made speeches showing an Indian map with chains around it.

Left party support is critical for the survival of the current Government, and the left parties are vehemently anti-US.

Good to see that even the left-supported Government is moving in the pro-US direction.

The Indian left behaves so treasonously that it's as if they were in the direct pay of the Commie part of China. I wouldn't be surprised if they were. The Chinese commies are smart enough to know that the best way 2 sabotage a democratic rival's rise is thru internal strife and India's lefties are dumb enuf to do treason in the name of a dead ideology.
I hear that in the 1962 India-China war, the Indian commies actually sided with the Chinese!! Why they escaped being banned as a legitimate political group escapes me.

2 posted on 01/08/2006 1:29:15 PM PST by voletti (Where there is no justice, there is only revenge.)

You are right on all the points.

The left parties are a major force and ruling majority in two states - West Bengal and Kerala. Coalition politics is how they get to influence at the national level.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.