Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mexico's contradictions playing U.S. for fools
San Bernardino Sun ^ | 1/8/2006 | Conor Friedersdorf

Posted on 01/08/2006 11:05:03 AM PST by Icelander

Since the 1910 Mexican Revolution, our neighbor to the south has chosen exactly one leader in a fair election, current President Vicente Fox. He presides over a nation where disparities of wealth between the working poor and the politically connected corrupt are as disheartening as the 40 percent of citizens living below the poverty line a figure that excludes those millions of poor Mexicans who immigrated to the United States seeking a better life.

The U.S. dollars earned by expatriate Mexicans and sent home as remittances keep hungry families from starving and a dysfunctional country from collapse. It is thus no surprise that President Fox fears a crackdown on illegal immigration. If the United States succeeds in keeping out illegal immigrants, Mexico won't benefit from a portion of their toil.

It is surprising, however,

that Mexican government and media elites demonstrate their nation's dependence on illegal immigrant-sent remittances not with appeals to good will, but with righteous indignation.

"Mexico is not going to bear, it is not going to permit, and it will not allow a stupid thing like this wall," Foreign Secretary Luis Ernesto Derbez warned.

"The defense of the life, the physical integrity and the human rights of our compatriots on U.S. soil cannot be delayed any longer," an influential Mexican newspaper editorialized this week, demanding that the United States create a system for the "orderly immigration" of all those seeking to come here.

In short, the Mexican government has taken the position that the United States must cease efforts to stop illegal immigration and admit within our borders anyone and everyone.

On merits, that stance isn't credible because the United States must place some limits on immigration if it hopes to assimilate those who come here, maintain sufficient infrastructure for its population and protect government services from being overwhelmed by a sudden influx of poor newcomers.

Still, I can't blame Mexican elites for voicing their preferences. They might well be better off if we opened our border completely.

What I cannot abide is Mexico's official pose open borders are a basic human right that only hardhearted, racist Americans would deny notwithstanding their own official policy of ruthlessly patrolling their southern border while maintaining an array of restrictions, and a dearth of free government benefits, for those foreigners who enter Mexico from the north or the south.

The contradiction between word and deed

signifies a disingenuousness insult because it means they're playing us for fools.

The tactic is counterproductive, too.

The more strident Mexican attacks become, the less compassion Americans will have for the immigrants streaming across our border. That's unfortunate. Those immigrants don't control their government officials (hence Mexico's poverty).

Moreover, responding in kind to official Mexican contempt while emotionally satisfying and perhaps justified ignores the reality that a strong, functional Mexico is very much in the best interest of the United States. It may well be that draconian enforcement policies and billions of dollars spent each year on border security will curtail illegal immigration.

Yet so will a more prosperous Mexico where wage disparities no longer force anyone with any ambition to flee their homeland for the U.S. economy.

I've heard pundits suggest a Marshall Plan for Mexico. I've read reports about how richer European Union nations sparked economic mini-miracles in Ireland and Spain through subsidies, and how the United States might do the same in a common market for the Americas.

If I knew which of these proposals, or what undiscovered approach, would raise living standards and economic prospects south of the border, I'd be working beside Paul Wolfowitz at the World Bank rather than writing this column.

I'm rather confident, however, that Mexico's government can enact changes that will bring about prosperity in that nation with far more ease and rapidity than changes suggested by or imposed from the outside.

A precondition of such progress would seem to be a greater focus among Mexican elites on the fixable flaws of their own nation and less time wasted on disingenuous carping about America's flawed border policies.

Conor Friedersdorf manages The Sun's blog on immigration issues. The blog, designed to provide a forum for opinions and information on immigration, is at www.beyondbordersblog.com.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Mexico
KEYWORDS: aliens; bombthemtodust; borderfence; borders; fence; illegal; immigrantlist; losingthewar; mexico; wall

1 posted on 01/08/2006 11:05:04 AM PST by Icelander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Icelander
I say we annex Mexico and settle it with Eastern Europeans.
2 posted on 01/08/2006 11:09:53 AM PST by Mike Darancette (Mesocons for Rice '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Icelander

...It seems , V. Fox should Read this papers' newstory.


3 posted on 01/08/2006 11:11:19 AM PST by skinkinthegrass (Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Icelander
I'm rather confident, however, that Mexico's government can enact changes that will bring about prosperity in that nation with far more ease and rapidity than changes suggested by or imposed from the outside.

The government will bring about prosperity? I thought it was the people that brought about prosperity. And that's the fundamental problem for Mexico.

4 posted on 01/08/2006 11:12:11 AM PST by KellyAdmirer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette

Just what we need, another hundred fifty million thieving welfare chiseling marxists.

Bomb them.


5 posted on 01/08/2006 11:14:38 AM PST by the gillman@blacklagoon.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Icelander
If I knew which of these proposals, or what undiscovered approach, would raise living standards and economic prospects south of the border, I'd be working beside Paul Wolfowitz at the World Bank rather than writing this column.

Don't waste your time...The Mexicans can't compete with China either...

6 posted on 01/08/2006 11:17:09 AM PST by Iscool (Start your own revolution by voting for the candidates the media (and gov't) tells you cannot win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com
hundred fifty million thieving welfare chiseling marxists

Only 106 Million now. But settling 40 - 50 Million Eastern Europeans would work.

7 posted on 01/08/2006 11:19:29 AM PST by Mike Darancette (Mesocons for Rice '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Icelander

The problem with the border can be fixed easily enough.

Annex Mexico as a US territory and admit each of their provinces to the Union as they become eligible for statehood. The laws governing Mexico shall be rewritten to conform with US customs and legal precedent. Like the inhabitants of Puerto Rico, they may then have free access to the greater US, citizens while in the US, and subjects of the US while in their home territory. That is, they would have no representation in Congress, but they would be subject to Federal law.

The more I consider this alternative, the better it sounds.


8 posted on 01/08/2006 11:19:58 AM PST by alloysteel (There is no substitute for success. None. Nobody remembers who was in second place.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Icelander
Nah, I heard an idea from someone that makes perfect sence... Charge Mexico 1 barrel of oil a day, for every illegal alien in the US. Halt all transfers of money from the US to Mexico until Mexico begins payment. If they (the Mexican government) wants to keep moving people up here to take the strain off of themselves, and still enrich their economy, then they (the Mexican government) needs to pay for the service.

Mark

9 posted on 01/08/2006 11:21:46 AM PST by MarkL (When Kaylee says "No power in the `verse can stop me," it's cute. When River says it, it's scary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarkL

Mike Savage claims this as his idea. It does sound reasonable.


10 posted on 01/08/2006 11:26:47 AM PST by Paladin2 (If the political indictment's from Fitz, the jury always acquits.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
Charge Mexico 1 barrel of oil a day, for every illegal alien in the US. Halt all transfers of money from the US to Mexico until Mexico begins payment. If they (the Mexican government) wants to keep moving people up here to take the strain off of themselves, and still enrich their economy, then they (the Mexican government) needs to pay for the service...Mike Savage claims this as his idea. It does sound reasonable.

Nah...Charge 'em 2 bbl./per wetback/illegal alien (1 add. as back interest, last 25 years :)

11 posted on 01/08/2006 11:39:09 AM PST by skinkinthegrass (Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Icelander
What? The U.S. is being played for fools by Mexico?

The truth is shining through.

12 posted on 01/08/2006 12:41:47 PM PST by Supernatural (All the truth in the world adds up to one big lie! bob dylan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson