Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Chi-townChief
Americans need to make a stand against this now.
Out of those 20,000 cases, show me one case of this so-called "abuse" where an innocent American has suffered because of it and I will vote straight democrat on the ticket next time.
THATS how sure I am about this situation. We all know they heard conversations of innocent people in the process of filtering data. It is only automated to a certain level, then it must be sorted. I am sure if a conversation of mine was one of them, they didn't waste valuable time logging my conversation about personal aspects of my humble existence. They really do have better things to do with their time. It doesn't bother me one bit, mainly because I have absolutely nothing to hide.
If the day comes when someone knocks on my door asking about it, or my personal life is somehow exposed to the public, that's when I will have a problem with it.
9 posted on 01/08/2006 9:35:12 AM PST by FunkyZero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: FunkyZero
The Dems have been producing cr** to get get Bush and weaken the Repub Party since he became a candidate.

AT THIS TIME, everything points to Hillary as the benefactor.

This is from the TCU (Texas Christian University) site as is an exerpt from one of the lawyers (Hillary Clinton) employed by the Democrat-controlled Judiciary Committee during the Nixon Watergate era.

The attorney, Hillary Clinton wrote: Impeachment was "one of the tools used by the English" to make their government "more reponsive and responsible". As such, it could be triggered by wrong-doing that was "not necessarily limited to common law or statutory...crimes". Instead, when impeachment had been used in American History, there had been "little emphasis on criminal conduct" but rather simply a need to remove public officials who had "seriously undermined public confidence" through their "course of conduct. "Impeachment", wrote twenty-eight year old Hillary Clinton in 1974, "is the first step in remedial process" to correct "serious offenses" that "undermine the integrity of the office."

As far as I can see, the polls are not working out for the Dems but they are working at it. I'd look for the words "integrity, serious, public confidence" in the polls.

Someplace, a long time ago...maybe about the time that Rathergate came out, I found an article about stating that what Hillary proposed to the Judiciary Committee to take Nixon down was both illegal and unconstitional...but I have not been able to locate it since.

10 posted on 01/08/2006 10:20:59 AM PST by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson