Posted on 01/08/2006 5:44:19 AM PST by Alas Babylon!
The Talk Shows
Sunday, January 8th, 2006
Guests to be interviewed today on major television talk shows:
FOX NEWS SUNDAY (Fox Network): Sens. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., and Lindsey Graham, R-S.C.; Rep. Jane Harman, D-Calif.
MEET THE PRESS (NBC): Sens. John Cornyn, R-Texas, and Charles Schumer, D-N.Y.
FACE THE NATION (CBS): Sens. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., and Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., chairman and ranking Democrat, respectively, of the Senate Judiciary Committee.
THIS WEEK (ABC): Sens. Edward M. Kennedy, D-Mass., and Sam Brownback, R-Kan.; General Motors Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Rick Wagoner.
LATE EDITION (CNN) : Israeli Vice Premier Shimon Peres and chief Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erakat; Specter and Leahy.
Thanks snugs as always and congrats.
YOU are welcome sleuth, good job.
But does he like RUMMY?
We LOVE RUMMY!
That was a good article...I just wish he would say some of this stuff on TV...but, it seems he comes across as "non-believing" toward the Bush Administration some times..
BTW...Stephen Hayes has been pounding this point for a long time...and he, too, keeps pointing out that Bush has more than enough evidence to back his reasons for going into Iraq...but, they haven't been made public...
I assume that during this time of war...President Bush would rather be prudent than set out day after day, showing his hand to just prove dems and MSM are idiots.
NO>..and, that is all that matters...
He and Bill O'Reilly have been pushing for Rummy's firing for a couple of years now...and that is just WRONG...
and makes their crediblity in other matters, suspect.
Correct???
Ridiculous, yes? Unless ... she talks to Osama and cohorts.
Maybe a tinfoil hat would help her.
But their base are radical nutcases so 24/7 is what they want.
Great job today,some good posts
I wish I could have seen that.
"I'll have to double check myself. I am certain every case with opinions issued are published."
That's my point. The judge can issue a ruling but not write the opinion or basis for his ruling. These cases do not provide stare decisis.
I still enjoy reading West Reporters on cases, especially those involving real estate, contracts and criminal.
Point of info: I did horribly in criminal law. I considered it a waste of time. You know, he was arrested so put him in jail. I loved contract law and real estate law. I studied intellectual property and have a patent license.
Guess what I practiced....
You win!! Criminal Defense!
No. Not all are published, but all are written. Google ...
appellate court unpublished opinions
... and you'll get a number of examples, e.g., http://www.judiciary.state.nj.us/opinions/
The substantive difference is that unpublished opinions aren't persuasive in future legal cases, and should not be cited as providing or applying a certain point of law. That may change in the future
Judicial Conference Supports Citing Unpublished OpinionsI suspect, but don't know for a fact, that some opinions are unpublished due to state secrecy.
Tony Mauro | Legal Times | 09-21-2005The policy-making body of the federal judiciary on Tuesday endorsed a sweeping rule change that will allow lawyers to cite unpublished opinions in federal appeals courts nationwide beginning in 2007.
http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1127207112718
Thanks! I appreciate the information.
Thanks for the clarification.
I agree with the idea of driving home the idea that it's best not to get pregnant in the first place but would also emphasize that she is not holding herself in high esteem if she has sex so early or too easily.
As for the argument about trauma, recent medical studies show that women and girls who have abortions have the same depression as women who miscarry. The difference is that the women who miscarry have more open discussions about their loss and have a better chance of getting better.
Also, my brother was adopted. His birth mom was a teenager and from what I learned, I can't even imagine what her mother put her through. We added my brother to our family, who is a good "kid" (yeah, he's grown now, but there you go). She became a veterinarian and built a happy life and a good family.
My brother contacted her and at first she was reticent about having any contact with him. But her children, siblings etc were thrilled to have another person in the family. Eventually she warmed up.
I guess what I am saying is that yes, there is pain and no, there isn't a magic way to make it go away.
But the world is a better place for her and us because she did have my brother.
Sorry that I had to run off.
LOL!
I didn't know that SU was a great law school, so thanks for that information. :-)
I think the saddest part is that any emotional hurt the woman or teenager feels in this whole process is blamed on external forces.
I agree that what we learn from science about pregnancy moves forward. We learn more about the baby's development and the impact on the woman/teenager all of the time.
The only blob there is would be Helen Thomas. :-)
I think there is some behavior conditioning of me going on here on Rod's part. :-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.