Posted on 01/06/2006 11:18:04 AM PST by Impeach98
Military strike against Iran may be necessary
-----------------------------------------------------
Posted: January 6, 2006 1:00 a.m. Eastern
© 2006 WorldNetDaily.com
In his Fact and Comment editorial in this week's Forbes magazine, Steve Forbes says out loud what many political insiders are thinking: Military action may be the only option left on the table to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapons program.
Forbes recognizes that the options left for the United States and its allies to stop the Iranians from developing a nuclear arsenal are few and far between.
And there should be little doubt that when, and if, Iran develops a nuclear weapon it would not hesitate to use it against either the United States or our allies.
Forbes argument has been strengthened by the news out of Iran this week – all of it very grim.
On Tuesday, Iran announced it would restart its nuclear fuel research program, determined to resume uranium enrichment – a process that would allow Iran to produce fuel for nuclear weapons.
Iran had suspended the program in November 2003 only after satellite photographs had revealed nuclear development sites in the Iranian cities of Arak and Natanz.
Leaders of Western nations have expressed outrage over the resumption of Iran's nuclear program. If Iran doesn't accede to their demands, representatives of European governments have threatened to ask the U.N. Security Council to look into the matter.
The mullahs in Tehran must be shaking in their turbans.
But the situation is much worse than what the Iranians have openly admitted to.
In the past 48 hours, British news outlets have reported on a leaked 55-page intelligence report that indicates that the Iranian regime of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has been secretly working to build a nuclear arsenal.
The British newspaper, the Guardian, says the report cites 16 Russian and 30 Chinese front companies that are at least partly owned by their respective governments which are helping Iran obtain the weaponry materials it needs on the black market.
That might suggest that those European diplomats will meet resistance on any "Shame on Iran" resolution at the U.N. Security Council, where both China and Russia are permanent members and would almost certainly veto any resolution hostile to the Iranian regime, strengthening my argument that the United Nations is a gutless organization (not to mention one with a horrifying history of corruption).
European intelligence reports also indicate that Iran is working to develop missiles capable of delivering a nuclear payload with a reach extending into Europe and Israel.
Such news must be particularly terrifying to Israel, America's strongest ally in the Middle East.
In October of last year, Iranian President Ahmadinejad called for the nation of Israel to be "wiped off the map." A nuclear strike is just one way the Iranian leader could get his wish, and in doing so earn the respect and admiration from millions of Islamic militants around the globe.
"Anyone who signs a treaty which recognizes the entity of Israel means he has signed the surrender of the Muslim world," Ahmadinejad was quoted as saying.
Ahmadinejad's view of a war with the West is alleged to have involved direct action against the United States. Several of those taken hostage in the awful 444-day long Iranian hostage crisis claim that Ahmadinejad was one of the hostage takers. The Iranian government denies these charges.
No matter what his involvement was with the hostage crisis, Ahmadinejad's view of history is just as twisted as his political beliefs.
He says that the Holocaust, in which 6 million Jews were slaughtered by the Nazi regime during World War II, is a "myth" and a "fairytale."
The Iranian state news agency, IRNA, reported this week that the response to Ahmadinejad's statements has been "positive."
The fundamentalists who rule Iran do not view co-existence with the West as an acceptable outcome under their perverse interpretation of Islam.
These radicals will continue to support, harbor, fund and embrace the most horrific and gruesome terrorist attacks against innocent civilians in the hopes of bringing the civilized world to its knees.
And one of the means by which they hope to accomplish their goals is by finalizing a nuclear program that has been under way for several years. If they had the opportunity, Iranian agents wouldn't hesitate to detonate a suitcase containing a nuclear device in an American city, killing untold thousands, if not millions.
When President Bush identified Iran as one of the central members of "the axis of evil" he was dead-on right.
The question before us is whether we will wait for yet another meaningless resolution from the United Nations.
Or, do we have the will to strike first to save our allies and ourselves?
If we un-spool the last of our political options and Iran's nuclear program continues, then we have no choice but to take pre-emptive military action to blow Iran's bomb-making facilities back into the Stone Age.
-------------------------------------------------------
RELATED OFFER:
Stand up to anti-military crowd! Fight back by supporting the new radio ad campaign of MoveAmericaForward.org.
------------------------------------------------------
Melanie Morgan is chairman of the conservative, pro-troop non-profit organization Move America Forward and is co-host of the "Lee Rodgers & Melanie Morgan Show" on KSFO 560 AM in San Francisco.
Halliburton
Bush
Cheney
Karl Freakin' Rove!
/s
Feel free to ad your own leftist squawk.
IMHO,our military is stretched too thin right now to do the kind of job that would be needed in Iran. Then of course you have all of the domestic appeasers, etc. who would go all out to stop us from having another front in the war on terrorism. Lastly, even though regime change could work, it needs to come internally - even anti-regime forces are probably nationalistic and might not necessarily welcome our direct military involvement.
Indeed ... sometimes 148 grains of lead are more effective than a few kilos of plutonium.
China is just doing good business and making money. They know Israel and the US will never allow Iran to complete their nuclear weapons development project. You'll never see a successful nuclear test by Iran, and China & Russia know that.
I didn't know it had ended yet.
I'm going through the motions of my daily life knowing that it may be all about to unravel, knowing that at best we're going to have to have an eyeball-to-eyeball confrontation with Iran. Then I look at those around me and realize that they are blissfully ignorant that this is what is coming to us. Pray.
We may not have enough troop strength for an invasion, but we can shut down their nuclear weapons program for several years with powerful airstrikes. Then it's up to the next administration and Israel to make sure their nuke weapons program remains permanently shut down.
They may be bluffing, they probably are, because Arabs usually talk big when they have an empty hand. If they were going to do something they would just do it.
Don't worry, this is a day at the beach compared to the Cuban Missile Crisis. We were only 24 hours from bombing Cuba when Kruschev decided to pull the misiles out of Cuba. A number of catastrophic scenarios could have unfolded if we had been forced to bomb Russian missiles and soldiers in Cuba.
With us forcing the situation with a final resolution that the UN will balk at.
If the UN had held to the final resolution against Iraq, then there wouldn't have been a war.
Suspect the same will play out with Iran. And that the same group of countries are probably making the same promises to Iran that they made to Iraq.
In the end, there will be some kind of military action against Iran because nothing has changed.
We shall taunt you a second time, you Irrrrrrrrrrraineeans who say "nuke!!"
Not being a military expert I am told that Isreal cannot take out the Iranian Nukes without help because their planes cant reach there without being refueled.
If we supply the tankers to refuel the Israeli planes we may as well help with the attack, because we will take the same abuse from the appeasers one way or the other.
It would if Yoko Ono was the singing messenger.....
You misspelled "Burqhaley"..... 8~)
No time to wait.
Strike first; talk later.
why would we even think about nuking Iran?
The israelis are precise in targeting individuals, I envision more of a Godfather scene where the Mullahs are all targeted and eliminated at one time, in essence clearing all family businees.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.