Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Now is the time for Congress and America to sock it to New York's Bloomberg, says gun law expert
NewsReleaseWire ^ | 01-05-2006 | John M. Snyder

Posted on 01/05/2006 10:42:21 PM PST by Coral Snake

Now is the time for Congress and America to sock it to New York's Bloomberg, says gun law expert

Washington, DC 20005

January 4 2006

"It's about time Congress and America's scores of millions of law-abiding firearm owners combined to really sock it to New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg and other local gun-hating officials around the country," gun law expert John Michael Snyder said here today.

"Fortunately," he added, "an absolutely appropriate legislative vehicle for doing just this already has been proposed in the U.S. House of Representatives."

Snyder said Bloomberg's inaugural pledge on New Year's Day to bring his proposal for more restrictive gun controls to the New York State Capitol in Albany and to the capitols of other states "is absolutely outrageous. It is an attempt on his part to blame others for problems with which he is incapable of dealing."

Snyder said that, "Bloomberg and other gun-grabbing politicians and officials bear much responsibility for violent criminal attacks on the innocent. Anti-gun policies of Bloomberg and his ilk lead criminals to realize they generally will not face armed citizens as they engage in their nefarious activities. There's nobody to stop these criminals and that largely is Bloomberg's fault and the fault of other anti-gun politicians. The policies of Bloomberg and company disarm law-abiding citizens and render decent people helpless in the face of violent criminal behavior. In a very real sense, the blood of the innocent is on their hands!"

"There is hope, though," said Snyder, "that Bloomberg and the others can be stopped in their tracks. Just before Congress adjourned last month, Congressman Cliff Stearns of Florida introduced H.R. 4547. This bill would amend title 18 of the United States Code to provide a national standard in accordance with which nonresidents of a State may carry concealed firearms in the State."

H.R. 4547 would provide that, notwithstanding any provision of the law of any State or political subdivision thereof, a person who is not prohibited by Federal law from possessing, transporting, shipping or receiving a firearm and is carrying a valid license or permit which is issued by a State and which permits the person to carry a concealed firearm (other than a machinegun or destructive device) may carry in another State a concealed firearm (other than a machinegun or destructive device) that has been shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce.

"What this would mean," continued Snyder, "is that if an individual legally may carry a concealed firearm in a State, he could carry it in another state, including New York.

"Enactment of this measure, similar to previous Stearns measures, really would turn the tables on Bloomberg and other local gun-haters who in effect oppose the ability and right of law-abiding American citizens to defend themselves and their loved ones from the violence of criminal predators."

Snyder said that, "promotion of the Stearns measure, referred to the House Judiciary Committee, should be right at the top of the agenda of the 80 to 85 million law-abiding gun owners in the United States. Let's encourage Members of Congress who believe practically in the individual Second Amendment civil right of law-abiding American citizens to keep and bear arms to cosponsor H.R. 4547 as soon as possible."

John M. Snyder (GunDean@aol.com) Manager Telum Associates, LLC P P Box 2844 Arlington, VA 22202 Phone : 202-326-5259 Fax : 202-898-1939


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS: antigunlies; banglist; bloomburg; gunrights; pinocchio; sockittohim
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 01/05/2006 10:42:22 PM PST by Coral Snake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Coral Snake
Sounds like a great way to cut down on tourist muggings, for certain.

Not to mention someone who gets a permit in say, Florida, who actually lives in NY being able to carry.

Full faith and credit for Concealed Carry is waaaay overdue.

2 posted on 01/05/2006 10:46:27 PM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower

ping


3 posted on 01/05/2006 10:47:36 PM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe
I like it.

L

4 posted on 01/05/2006 10:58:10 PM PST by Lurker (You don't let a pack of wolves into the house just because they're related to the family dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Coral Snake

How many other FReepers can hook their thumbs under their suspenders and say "That's MY Congressman!?"
:o)
Yay Cliffy!


5 posted on 01/05/2006 11:02:08 PM PST by papertyger (We have done the impossible, and that makes us mighty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coral Snake
Wonder how many shooters and bullet catchers are protecting his honor?
6 posted on 01/05/2006 11:03:58 PM PST by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Does anyone know whether the proposed legislation would protect employees from corporate policy reprisals? How about restaurant and retail customers?


7 posted on 01/05/2006 11:16:57 PM PST by AlienCrossfirePlayer (Proud life member of the NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coral Snake
I have mixed feelings about this. I love guns, own dozens, and have held carry permits in three states. However, this is coming mighty close to trampling on the principles of federalism and states' rights. I suspect this may pass muster under the Militia Clause, but as far as I know, no court has ever held that the Second Amendment has been incorporated by the 14th.
8 posted on 01/05/2006 11:35:10 PM PST by ccmay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ccmay

Thanks for saving me the trouble of writing exactly what you did.


9 posted on 01/05/2006 11:49:16 PM PST by Hank Rearden (Never allow anyone who could only get a government job attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Coral Snake

Full faith and credit If my TX DL is good in New york then my Texas CHL (which was much harder to get) should be also.


10 posted on 01/05/2006 11:53:25 PM PST by BigCinBigD (Merry Christmas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ccmay
but as far as I know, no court has ever held that the Second Amendment has been incorporated by the 14th.

How many legs would a horse have if the Supreme Court called a tail a leg?

11 posted on 01/05/2006 11:57:40 PM PST by supercat (Sony delinda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Coral Snake

This is a great idea....


But, I bet you can't get the votes to put it through.


12 posted on 01/06/2006 12:33:40 AM PST by MedicalMess
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coral Snake

That isn't cocking New York. It is liberating us!


13 posted on 01/06/2006 12:53:15 AM PST by rmlew (Sedition and Treason are both crimes, not free speech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rmlew
I meant to write "socking it".
That isn't socking it to New York. It is liberating us!

I think I'll go to bed before I make any more amusing typos.

14 posted on 01/06/2006 12:54:40 AM PST by rmlew (Sedition and Treason are both crimes, not free speech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Coral Snake

This almost sounds too good to be true.


15 posted on 01/06/2006 3:20:19 AM PST by shekkian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ccmay
I'll remind you of NFA and the change to Title 18 of the United States Code, signed into law July of 2004 allowing off duty or retired Peace Officers, to carry concealed in all 50 states.

Does either of these laws bother you about states rights?
16 posted on 01/06/2006 3:34:14 AM PST by tiger-one (The night has a thousand eyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ccmay; Hank Rearden
ccmay wrote:

I have mixed feelings about this. I love guns, own dozens, and have held carry permits in three states.
However, this is coming mighty close to trampling on the principles of federalism and states' rights.

I suspect this may pass muster under the Militia Clause, but as far as I know, no court has ever held that the Second Amendment has been incorporated by the 14th.

Hmmm, -- just what 'principle is trampled' by admitting that our right to keep & bear arms cannot be infringed by local or state governments?

I've never quite understood what right is lost by demanding that States comply with our 'Law of the Land', just as Art VI says.

Perhaps you two can explain?

17 posted on 01/06/2006 3:47:41 AM PST by don asmussen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Coral Snake

Only the good and obedient would disarm for Bloomberg

And Bloomberg has a conflict of interest in taxing towns surrounding NYC for his own problems. It's always the same thing: corrupt confederate judges trying to control and take other wealthy counties' revenues by blaming them...all the while they maintain in their own counties the very criminals which will be used to link and accuse other counties.

We need a Lincolnian enforcement of Union interest in this. Bloomberg is violating interstate commerce and causing extrajudicial interferences


18 posted on 01/06/2006 3:55:38 AM PST by JudgemAll (Condemn me, make me naked and kill me, or be silent for ever on my gun ownership and law enforcement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe
"Full faith and credit for Concealed Carry is waaaay overdue."

Unfortunately, the only example of the application of the Full faith and Credit Clause in the US Constitution these days involves Gay Marriage rather than the Second Amendment to that same US Constitution.
19 posted on 01/06/2006 3:57:56 AM PST by wmileo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Coral Snake

Bloomberg is basicaly seeking the enforcing of a "public-private" third way partnership with criminals: he's asking NYC criminals to contribute to the blaming of other cities. It's like the drug war: first they let the dealer squeeze you, and, then, once squeezed out, the dealer becomes informant and denounces said people who get squeezed by the cops...whatever's left of it, that is.


20 posted on 01/06/2006 3:58:19 AM PST by JudgemAll (Condemn me, make me naked and kill me, or be silent for ever on my gun ownership and law enforcement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson