Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Spying, CNN and the Kerry campaign: Is there a there there? [Did GW spy on CNN reporter & Kerry?]
Salon - Politics/War Room ^ | Jan 5, 2006 | Tim Grieve

Posted on 01/05/2006 12:43:20 PM PST by summer

It gets curiouser and curiouser.

As we noted Wednesday, [a liberal site] noticed an odd moment in Andrea Mitchell's interview this week with New York Times reporter James Risen: While interviewing Risen about his new book and revelations that George W. Bush authorized warrantless spying on American citizens, Mitchell asked Risen if he had any information suggesting that CNN's international correspondent, Christiane Amanpour, "might have been eavesdropped upon." Risen said he didn't. But as [the liberal site] surmised, the question certainly suggested that Mitchell did.

Right about the time the [liberal site's] theory started floating through the blogosphere, somebody deleted Mitchell's question and Risen's answer from the transcript posted on MSNBC's Web site. We said we'd like to hear an explanation, and TVNewser actually went to the trouble of getting one. "Unfortunately this transcript was released prematurely," reads a statement TVNewser says it got from NBC. "It was a topic on which we had not completed our reporting, and it was not broadcast on 'NBC Nightly News' nor on any other NBC News program. We removed that section of the transcript so that we may further continue our inquiry."

Assuming the statement is legitimate, that sure seems to us like a long way of saying, "Yeah, we're looking into the possibility that the Bush administration was eavesdropping on Christiane Amanpour."

Now, it's probably time for a deep breath and some patience here. What we've got here is some reading between the lines, and it's about a question, not an answer. But as we said yesterday, if the answer is ultimately answered in the affirmative -- that is, if the Bush administration has indeed been listening in on Amanpour's phone -- the implications are enormous. We don't much like the idea that the government might be listening in on the conversations of a reporter. And Amanpour isn't just any reporter: She is married to Jamie Rubin, a State Department spokesman under Bill Clinton and a foreign policy advisor to John Kerry's presidential campaign. If the Bush administration was listening in on Amanpour's phone, was it listening when she talked with her husband? Was it listening when he might have used her phone himself?

Again, what we've got here are hints about a question. We're a long way from an answer. But when you start circumventing Congress and the courts and begin to spy on Americans in a way that you insist you aren't, you invite questions like these. And along the way, you invite people to think about the last time some people who worked for a president tried to spy on the opposition.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: amanpour; americahaters; bushhaters; clintonnewsnetwork; cnn; gw; kerry; lurch; patriotleak; spying
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 last
To: Darkwolf377

>>
"The Chappaqua Cheeks Are Spreading!"
<<

I am about to lose my lunch.

Didn't James Bond use that one in "Dr. No"?


101 posted on 01/05/2006 3:42:53 PM PST by noblejones (Ben Stein for President, 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: noblejones

The Chappaqua Cheeks are a legendary monster, sitting their way across America, crushing anything paid for with earned dollars, leaving only objects purchased with Food Stamps and welfare checks standing. CONSIDERED VERY DANGEROUS!


102 posted on 01/05/2006 3:47:34 PM PST by Darkwolf377 (The first and great commandment is: Don't let them scare you. --Elmer Davis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: summer

DU's in a later over these quotes...and Safire having been bugged? I'll have to do a FR search, I just don't remember hearing this.


103 posted on 01/05/2006 4:27:24 PM PST by Katya (Homo Nosce Te Ipsum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: summer
John Effing Kerry, the View Nam traitor who went and had discussions with the enemy in Paris during Viet Nam, should be covered under surveillance of an "enemy" at time of war under CIC authorization. The fact that he just happens to be a Senator is beside the fact - he can still be an enemy of the US. I cannot explain why the people of MA keep sending Kerry and the swimmer back to the Senate year after year . . . .
104 posted on 01/05/2006 5:14:20 PM PST by p23185 (Why isn't attempting to take down a sitting Pres & his Admin considered Sedition?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze

placemark


105 posted on 01/05/2006 5:15:01 PM PST by prairiebreeze (Take the high road. You'll never have to meet a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: summer

More straw grasping. You'd think by know the left's hands would be full.


106 posted on 01/05/2006 5:17:44 PM PST by Fledermaus (Please explain the difference between Al-Qaeda and the Left? Anyone? Anyone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: summer
if the Bush administration has indeed been listening in on Amanpour's phone -- the implications are enormous.

I think the idea that Armanpour's phone was tapped by the government is ridiculous, but I'll bet the author didn't consider the obvious implication: that that number would have been connected to Al Qaeda.

107 posted on 01/05/2006 5:32:40 PM PST by alnick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: summer
"Yeah, we're looking into the possibility that the Bush administration was eavesdropping on Christiane Amanpour."

Hey, this fantasy accusation game sounds like fun. I wanna play too.

Like, um, I won the Power Ball lottery for $100 million just last week, but the DNC sent an agent to my home and stole the winning ticket.

Think I can get an investigation?

108 posted on 01/05/2006 5:40:10 PM PST by Edit35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

You must really be good at ignoring your detractors to see me as the sole voice against your view on this thread.


109 posted on 01/05/2006 6:49:26 PM PST by pgyanke (The Son of God became a man to enable men to become sons of God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Pondman88
If Amanpour was talking to terroristss or suspected terrorists (which wouldn't surprise me) I hope we were spying on her.

I agree. I wouldn't trust her any further than I could throw her.

110 posted on 01/05/2006 7:02:26 PM PST by meema (I am a Conservative Traditional Republican, NOT an elitist, sexist , cynic or right wing extremist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pgyanke
I don't see you as the sole voice against my view. You can't read very well.

I couldn't care less if everyone or no one was against my point of view.

111 posted on 01/05/2006 8:47:53 PM PST by Darkwolf377 (The first and great commandment is: Don't let them scare you. --Elmer Davis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson