Replies

You people who predicted that President Bush was going to lose the elections all year long in 2004, have suddenly changed your dumb argument from president Bush certain defeat prediction to a dumber argument of how did Bush win only by few points over a weak candidate like Kerry. You did this in order to save face after your moronic analysis and predictions last year were proven wrong, and you think that many on FR did not notice this.

Oh boy. Did you blow it!

"You people who predicted that President Bush was going to lose the elections all year long in 2004, have suddenly changed your dumb argument from president Bush certain defeat prediction to a dumber argument of how did Bush win only by few points over a weak candidate like Kerry."

I had predicted a Bush victory, a gain in the Senate, and a gain in the House in 2004, before Kerry was even nominated. As for goldstategop, I don't recall him predicting a Bush defeat in 2004 either, although I only rarely track a sampling of his posts.

The point is, we want more change and less corruption in DC. Is that stupid? Only to a Bushbot or a rat, it appears.

YOU DEMANDED PROOF? WELL HERE IT IS, YOU SLANDERING LIAR!
I DEMAND AN APOLOGY.

And BTW, how many people predicted gains in the House, Senate, and a Bush win prior to Kerry's nomination?

08/20/2004

Bush might not win Taxachuttssess and other New England states. Nor can he count on Fairyland, even though that state was glad to send the Sniper team down here in Virginia to face genuine justice. I'm not sure about Ohio either: they are so busy turning parents into sunburn felons out there. But as for the almost-sane states, Bush will win, like I've been telling people since Howard Dean.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1195292/posts?page=4#4

I'm glad that the grass roots doesn't feel too comfortable, but they are correct to feel very, very hopeful. I believe Bush will win. I believe we will pick up senate seats and House seats. I believed this before the rat primary was finished. It's not because of polls. It's because of the difficulty the rats had in finding a credible prez. candidate.

Their candidates are not suited for high-information campaigns. They are only suited for old BS alphabet channel campaigns. We now have people at the grass roots joining up because of books, talk radio, and the internet. At the same time, poorly-informed rats are joining at the grass roots due to slanders, half-truths, and rubbish.

Perhaps it's naive to think this way, but it's the future will of the public that counts in elections, not yesterday's polls. Looking ahead, there will continue to be bad surprises for rats, and good surprises for conservatives. There will always be setbacks. But net total, we'll defy previous trends and continue to advance, because that is what the people will call for as they grow more informed.

FReegards....

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1195292/posts?page=13#13