Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judgement Day for Republicans
WND.com ^ | 01-05-06 | Farah, Joseph

Posted on 01/05/2006 6:18:00 AM PST by Theodore R.

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-128 next last
To: jveritas

My mom had taken a magic marker and made little purple hearts on bandaids. I passed them out to people. It was a real hoot! Obviously, that was not the only factor, and people like my mom may have been rare across the country. But Bush, a successful wartime incumbent, did have a hard time with such a vulnerable twit, which is the basic point being made, IMHO.


21 posted on 01/05/2006 7:18:21 AM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March (Fight corruption by choking government power and curbing government spending.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner
Doesn't matter. The MSM (from which most folks STILL get their news) will make it a Republican problem. "Culture of Corruption" doncha know.
2006 ain't here yet, but 'Pubbies are real good at shooting themselves in the food. Their only hope is that the Demonicrats mover further out over Soros/Dean/Moore cliff.
22 posted on 01/05/2006 7:18:44 AM PST by Little Ray (I'm a reactionary, hirsute, gun-owning, knuckle dragging, Christian Neanderthal and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sir Francis Dashwood

It is better that Jeb Bush runs for the Senate seat this year in Florida. This will almost guarantee that we will take this seat from the democrat Bill Nelson.


23 posted on 01/05/2006 7:22:03 AM PST by jveritas (The Axis of Defeatism: Left wing liberals, Buchananites, and third party voters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March

You people who predicted that President Bush was going to lose the elections all year long in 2004, have suddenly changed your dumb argument from president Bush certain defeat prediction to a dumber argument of how did Bush win only by few points over a weak candidate like Kerry. You did this in order to save face after your moronic analysis and predictions last year were proven wrong, and you think that many on FR did not notice this.


24 posted on 01/05/2006 7:27:19 AM PST by jveritas (The Axis of Defeatism: Left wing liberals, Buchananites, and third party voters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
Joe Farah a Buchananite bitter and delusional loser making an analysis on what he sees in his wet dream.

I agree pretty much with you. That said, I think he's right in the article.

25 posted on 01/05/2006 7:29:32 AM PST by Cyber Liberty (© 2006, Ravin' Lunatic since 4/98)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cyber Liberty
You agree with him that the Democrats are going to take over Congress this year?!
26 posted on 01/05/2006 7:32:32 AM PST by jveritas (The Axis of Defeatism: Left wing liberals, Buchananites, and third party voters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Oh boy. Did you blow it!

"You people who predicted that President Bush was going to lose the elections all year long in 2004, have suddenly changed your dumb argument from president Bush certain defeat prediction to a dumber argument of how did Bush win only by few points over a weak candidate like Kerry."

I had predicted a Bush victory, a gain in the Senate, and a gain in the House in 2004, before Kerry was even nominated. As for goldstategop, I don't recall him predicting a Bush defeat in 2004 either, although I only rarely track a sampling of his posts.

The point is, we want more change and less corruption in DC. Is that stupid? Only to a Bushbot or a rat, it appears.


27 posted on 01/05/2006 7:32:50 AM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March (Fight corruption by choking government power and curbing government spending.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

If this Abramof thing goes really badly, yes I do. Remember the House Bank scandal? This could be worse.


28 posted on 01/05/2006 7:34:32 AM PST by Cyber Liberty (© 2006, Ravin' Lunatic since 4/98)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March
Not you did not. I remember your posts and posts of many of your ilks who tell me the same every time I expose them.
29 posted on 01/05/2006 7:35:29 AM PST by jveritas (The Axis of Defeatism: Left wing liberals, Buchananites, and third party voters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner

Whenever I hear one of the rats say "This is a Republican Scandal", all I can think is "Gotcha. Gotcha. Gotcha, Gotcha, Gotcha." Frankly I hope it blows the dome off the capitol, in a political sense of course.

I don't see voting in the weak-kneed, Monday morning quarterbacking, terrorist supporting, cut & run, socialist, democrat party though, scandal or not.


30 posted on 01/05/2006 7:35:31 AM PST by ichabod1 (Sic Omnia Gloria Fugit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Correct. But don't expect the wilfully blind to see.


31 posted on 01/05/2006 7:36:29 AM PST by the gillman@blacklagoon.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Boston Legal, even though it has a left-leaning politica bent, is the BEST show on TV right now, IMHO.


32 posted on 01/05/2006 7:37:09 AM PST by NYC Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Sir Francis Dashwood

I wouldn't vote for Jeb any more than Hillary Guliani or McMainiac.


33 posted on 01/05/2006 7:37:42 AM PST by the gillman@blacklagoon.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Is there ANY chance of Jeb running for Senate? If you look at the Ras poll, Harris is being BLOWN out by Nelson, by over 20%. Her favorables are like 35%, her unfavorables 53% (or some ridiculous numbers like those). She should drop her bid pronto.


34 posted on 01/05/2006 7:39:06 AM PST by NYC Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March

So many things have happened, malfeasance covered up (like the berglar and Able Danger), rats allowed to slide, that make no sense that I am left with no conclusion but that the party in power must be crooked as h-e-double hockey sticks.


35 posted on 01/05/2006 7:40:48 AM PST by ichabod1 (Sic Omnia Gloria Fugit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

You just slandered me. Back in 2004, I had the prediction of Bush's and congressional wins in my profile. Show a single post of me predicting Bush's defeat in 2004, or apologize, you slanderous liar!


36 posted on 01/05/2006 7:41:17 AM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March (Fight corruption by choking government power and curbing government spending.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Cyber Liberty
The House scandal did not bring the GOP to power in 1994. The GOP had a national campaign based on constructive ideas to fix the country and that is how they won back then.

Please tell me what is the constructive national agenda that the democrats will present to the American voters so it allows them to take over Congress? It is the cut and run policy in Iraq? Protecting the terrorist rights against eavesdropping? Boasting that they killed the Patriot Act? More taxes? Pro-Gay agenda? Pro-Abortion?

37 posted on 01/05/2006 7:41:51 AM PST by jveritas (The Axis of Defeatism: Left wing liberals, Buchananites, and third party voters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March
Since it is your posts, why you do not go ahead and research it and show me the posts where you predicted President Bush win in 2004.
38 posted on 01/05/2006 7:44:24 AM PST by jveritas (The Axis of Defeatism: Left wing liberals, Buchananites, and third party voters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: NYC Republican
I just hope that he will run. He still have a month or two to decide.
39 posted on 01/05/2006 7:45:36 AM PST by jveritas (The Axis of Defeatism: Left wing liberals, Buchananites, and third party voters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
There will be no "constructive agenda."

No, the house banking scandal did not cause the '94 election results. I knew that already. This was a couple of years before '94. It did not cause a party change because pols from both parties got burned.

40 posted on 01/05/2006 7:49:10 AM PST by Cyber Liberty (© 2006, Ravin' Lunatic since 4/98)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-128 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson