[Wasanother]

He's a leaker but not the leaker in the current controversy because "he says he was not part of the intercept program which has been in the news."

[bnelson44]

"He's a leaker but not the leaker in the current controversy because "he says he was not part of the intercept program which has been in the news."

Not necessarily, he would have only had to know about the program, not participate in it.

[p23185]

He's a leaker but not the leaker in the current controversy because "he says he was not part of the intercept program which has been in the news."

Believe me, NSA has everything compartmentalized and he will only be able to "leak" little bits.

[El Gato]

He's a leaker but not the leaker in the current controversy because "he says he was not part of the intercept program which has been in the news."

Which means all he can really provide is here-say. But anything to Bash the President, and the DIA and NSA, I'm sure the Dims will give him a hearing. Even if it's one of those basement hearings with only Democrap Congress Critters present.

[Lady Heron]

He's a leaker but not the leaker in the current controversy because "he says he was not part of the intercept program which has been in the news."

Looks like this guy followed protocol for whistleblowing in the NSA, he did not get the results he wanted and took it to far and they labeled him a loon......it might not be fair or it might be, but this has nothing to do with the story at hand about the leaks of classified info.

If this guy now decides to talk about classified info to the public he just might find himself in the same boat as the leaker.