Skip to comments.
Bush Appoints Deputy Defense Secretary in Recess (Lib Rage Grows)
Reuters via Yahoo! News ^
| January 4, 2006
Posted on 01/04/2006 7:33:55 PM PST by new yorker 77
President George W. Bush on Wednesday bypassed the Senate during the congressional recess and appointed Gordon England to be deputy defense secretary.
Bush had nominated England when he was Navy Secretary to the No. 2 Defense Department post to succeed Paul Wolfowitz in March, but the nomination stalled in the Senate amid concern among some lawmakers.
England has been acting deputy defense secretary and was performing most of those duties.
Bush also did a recess appointment for Dorrance Smith as head of the Pentagon's public affairs department after the nomination ran into resistance among some Democrats on the Senate Armed Services Committee.
A "recess appointment," made when Congress is not in session, bypasses Congress but only lasts until the new Congress is sworn in, which will be in January 2007.
Copyright © 2006 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.
Copyright © 2006 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: dod; gordonengland; recessappointment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
To: new yorker 77
2
posted on
01/04/2006 7:35:22 PM PST
by
Just A Nobody
(I - LOVE - my attitude problem! WBB lives on. Beware the Enemedia.)
To: new yorker 77
Appointed in March, 10 months the 'rats have held up another National Security Position. Looks like Bush is executing his Constitutional duties.
To: new yorker 77
Good. Shove another Boltenesque thumb in Dingy Harry's eye.
4
posted on
01/04/2006 7:36:03 PM PST
by
pissant
To: Justanobody
5
posted on
01/04/2006 7:36:27 PM PST
by
acapesket
(never had a vote count in all my years here)
To: new yorker 77
Why doth the liberal rage?
6
posted on
01/04/2006 7:37:15 PM PST
by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: new yorker 77
God help us, he's hijacking America!
:-) Sarcasm definitely intended.
7
posted on
01/04/2006 7:37:28 PM PST
by
Herford Turley
(Conservatism will save America)
To: new yorker 77
And he appointed him without a warrant.
8
posted on
01/04/2006 7:37:45 PM PST
by
atomicpossum
(Replies should be as pedantic as possible. I love that so much.)
To: new yorker 77
9
posted on
01/04/2006 7:38:30 PM PST
by
Cinnamon
To: All
Gordon England
10
posted on
01/04/2006 7:38:43 PM PST
by
new yorker 77
(FAKE POLLS DO NOT TRANSLATE INTO REAL VOTERS!)
To: new yorker 77
Anyone have a "stand up and applaud" pic?
11
posted on
01/04/2006 7:39:42 PM PST
by
mirkwood
(If I were two-faced, would I be wearing this one? -Abraham Lincoln)
To: new yorker 77
England has been acting deputy defense secretary and was performing most of those duties.
England has the responsibility; he should have the title and the authority that goes with it.
Good for our President!
12
posted on
01/04/2006 7:41:10 PM PST
by
i_dont_chat
(Bush lied, people dyed. Their fingers. [Stolen from Mark Steyn].)
To: atomicpossum
And he appointed him without a warrant. Good one!
13
posted on
01/04/2006 7:43:41 PM PST
by
Christian4Bush
(Over THREE THOUSAND PEOPLE lost their 'civil liberties' on September 11, 2001.)
To: new yorker 77
Screw the obstructionist anti-American libs. Just maybe we will see Bush deliver to them exactly what they deserve in the way of respect...NOTHING.
14
posted on
01/04/2006 7:46:59 PM PST
by
EagleUSA
To: new yorker 77
So what was the reason for the hold-up?
15
posted on
01/04/2006 7:48:35 PM PST
by
byteback
To: new yorker 77; All
Want to see another good move by Bush? Remember McCain's Al Quida Bill of Rights? Seems Bush put a caveat on it when he signed it, unbeknowst to anyone a couple of weeks ago.... :-)
Bush could bypass new torture ban Waiver right is reserved
After approving the bill last Friday, Bush issued a ''signing statement" -- an official document in which a president lays out his interpretation of a new law -- declaring that he will view the interrogation limits in the context of his broader powers to protect national security. This means Bush believes he can waive the restrictions, the White House and legal specialists said.
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2006/01/04/bush_could_bypass_new_torture_ban/
16
posted on
01/04/2006 7:48:40 PM PST
by
Soul Seeker
(Mr. President: It is now time to turn over the money changers' tables.)
To: mirkwood
To: new yorker 77
but only lasts until the new Congress is sworn in, which will be in January 2007. I pray that the American voters will be wise enough to vote in a congress with a spine!
18
posted on
01/04/2006 7:49:12 PM PST
by
Just Lori
(The road to hell is paved by liberals.)
To: new yorker 77
HOO-YA! Way to go, Mr. Commander-in-Chief!
19
posted on
01/04/2006 7:50:47 PM PST
by
baa39
To: new yorker 77
Can anyone out there describe what happens when their recess appointment runs out? Do they get renominated?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson