[A CA Guy]

Yep, Letterman came off as spiteful. Seemed to spit hate out without any facts. Wanted to blame the President for us being in Iraq like it was a bad thing.

What I don't get is how come even O'R doesn't mention that that Saddam while under sanctions was financing terror is Israel with homicide bombing?
Seems a dictator who pays for terrorism and who tried to take out a USA President while under UN sanctions should be removed from the Presidency.

What's the big deal about us being in Iraq that is a problem, I don't get this?

[beaversmom]

O'Reilly is okay to a point but he's not the best debater out there. Just shows you how stupid Letterman is--he thinks O'Reilly outsmarted him with his points. Letterman would be speechless if he went up against a Medved for instance.

[WestVirginiaRebel]

O'Reilly could and should have responded with the fact that Bill Clinton wanted regime change in Iraq and bombed the crap out of Baghdad while he was in the process of getting impeached.

The whole thing was just nasty and I'm glad Bill gave Dave what for as much as he did. Dave's hairpiece is smarter than he is.