Skip to comments.
Lawsuit Suggests Men May Be Adopting 'Feminist' Tactics
http://www.foxnews.com/index.html ^
| Tuesday, January 03, 2006
| Wendy McElroy
Posted on 01/03/2006 4:56:16 PM PST by teldon30
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
1
posted on
01/03/2006 4:56:17 PM PST
by
teldon30
To: teldon30
I take the club's side in this one. While it would certainly put a stick in the eyes of the feminists, the fact remains that businesses should have the right to serve whoever they choose to.
2
posted on
01/03/2006 4:58:45 PM PST
by
misterrob
(Democrats, The Party of Treason)
To: teldon30
I liked it better when men and women could have private clubs.
To: misterrob
"I take the club's side in this one. While it would certainly put a stick in the eyes of the feminists, the fact remains that businesses should have the right to serve whoever they choose to."
there is a difference between a private club and a public buisiness. The business is usually legally a place of public accomodation. i don't know how this club in question is structured... it could go either way.
For example it's legal for Augusta National, a private country club to not have female members but it's not legal the local kroger to refuse to sell beer to black people.
4
posted on
01/03/2006 5:03:13 PM PST
by
gondramB
(If even once you pay danegeld then you never get rid of the Dane.)
To: teldon30
settled in January 2005 on the condition that men have full access to classes and facilities, with the exception of lockers and showers.But, but, women are allowed in NFL and NBA locker rooms.
To: gondramB
I said should. It's against the law to discriminate against anyone but:
Men
Whites
Christians
Conservatives
6
posted on
01/03/2006 5:05:56 PM PST
by
misterrob
(Democrats, The Party of Treason)
To: misterrob
While it would certainly put a stick in the eyes of the feminists, the fact remains that businesses should have the right to serve whoever they choose to. This is just stupid and mean-spirited. I mean, what guy REALLY feels that he will get equal or better excercise at a chick gym?
To what end was this lawsuit really filed?
7
posted on
01/03/2006 5:06:26 PM PST
by
freedumb2003
(American troops cannot be defeated. American Politicians can.)
To: teldon30
Feminism is stupid and this is just as stupid.
8
posted on
01/03/2006 5:07:17 PM PST
by
Tribune7
To: freedumb2003
Someone who obviously wants to prove a point. If men are not allowed to have their own clubs then women don't get to have them either. Frankly. most of the women who go to chick only gyms are not really ones you want to see anyway.
9
posted on
01/03/2006 5:11:01 PM PST
by
misterrob
(Democrats, The Party of Treason)
To: teldon30
I was a member of a health club that was forcibly "co-educated" in the 80's by a militant feminist who openly crowed that she didn't have the faintest intention of ever actually working out there. After they went under - the judgment was that they had to supply
equal shower and bathroom facilities to both sexes, immediately - nobody else did either.
This is just as wrong, IMHO, but if there is a feeling of "sauce for the goose" in it, that's why. We need a consistent public policy on the matter. I'd be fine with it either way, but not one that dictates equal access for women and no access for men.
To: gondramB
About 20 years ago in Houston, a group of African-Americans sued a club composed only of German descendants for discrimination. The club had a nice club house and swimming pool which they wanted to use.
They won; were able to join the club and in a very short time trashed both the club house and pool.
11
posted on
01/03/2006 5:15:25 PM PST
by
lonestar
(Me, too--Weinie)
To: SouthernFreebird
> I liked it better when men and women could have private clubs.
That's one of the advantages of being a Freemason.
12
posted on
01/03/2006 5:21:16 PM PST
by
DieHard the Hunter
(I am the Chieftain of my Clan. I bow to nobody. Get out of my way.)
To: misterrob
13
posted on
01/03/2006 5:24:17 PM PST
by
Fierce Allegiance
(There is water at the bottom of the ocean.)
To: misterrob
the fact remains that businesses should have the right to serve whoever they choose to. I agree. Maybe if the feminazis get enough pokes in the eye, they'll quit violating the rights of men.
14
posted on
01/03/2006 5:28:04 PM PST
by
ArrogantBustard
(Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
To: misterrob
Some women prefer to workout without men around, but the way to get those women on our side on this is for the court to hold this type of discrimination illegal. The more people who join the side of businesses having a right within reason to set their own policies the better. I bet now there are some clients of this business who are all in favor of forcing businesses that cater only to males to allow women.
15
posted on
01/03/2006 5:41:27 PM PST
by
JLS
To: teldon30
Lawsuit Suggests Men May Be Adopting 'Feminist' Tactics
I don't care what happens we aren't burning our bras !!!
16
posted on
01/03/2006 5:44:12 PM PST
by
festus
(The constitution may be flawed but its a whole lot better than what we have now.)
To: teldon30
To: teldon30
18
posted on
01/03/2006 5:51:28 PM PST
by
sandbar
To: festus
"I don't care what happens we aren't burning our bras !!!"Bro's, ya mean
19
posted on
01/03/2006 5:55:48 PM PST
by
muir_redwoods
(Free Sirhan Sirhan, after all, the bastard who killed Mary Jo Kopechne is walking around free)
To: misterrob
Smokers, you forgot smokers. And heterosexuals. And meat eaters.
20
posted on
01/03/2006 6:10:58 PM PST
by
Doctor Raoul
(Raoul's First Law of Journalism: BIAS = LAYOFFS)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson