Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Device Will Sense Through Concrete Walls
American Forces Press Service ^ | Jan 3, 2005 | Donna Miles

Posted on 01/03/2006 4:23:08 PM PST by SandRat

WASHINGTON, Jan. 3, 2006 – Troops conducting urban operations soon will have the capabilities of superheroes, being able to sense through 12 inches of concrete to determine if someone is inside a building.

The new "Radar Scope" will give warfighters searching a building the ability to tell within seconds if someone is in the next room, Edward Baranoski from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency's Special Projects Office, told the American Forces Press Service.

By simply holding the portable, handheld device up to a wall, users will be able to detect movements as small as breathing, he said.

The Radar Scope, developed by DARPA, is expected to be fielded to troops in Iraq as soon as this spring, Baranoski said. The device is likely to be fielded to the squad level, for use by troops going door to door in search of terrorists.

The Radar Scope will give warfighters the capability to sense through a foot of concrete and 50 feet beyond that into a room, Baranoski explained.

It will bring to the fight what larger, commercially available motion detectors couldn't, he said. Weighing just a pound and a half, the Radar Scope will be about the size of a telephone handset and cost just about $1,000, making it light enough for a soldier to carry and inexpensive enough to be fielded widely.

The Radar Scope will be waterproof and rugged, and will run on AA batteries, he said.

"It may not change how four-man stacks go into a room (during clearing operations)," Baranoski said. "But as they go into a building, it can help them prioritize what rooms they go into. It will give them an extra degree of knowledge so they know if someone is inside."

Even as the organization hurries to get the devices to combat forces, DARPA already is laying groundwork for bigger plans that build on this technology.

Proposals are expected this week for the new "Visi Building" technology that's more than a motion detector. It will actually "see" through multiple walls, penetrating entire buildings to show floor plans, locations of occupants and placement of materials such as weapons caches, Baranoski said.

"It will give (troops) a lot of opportunity to stake out buildings and really see inside," he said. "It will go a long way in extending their surveillance capabilities."

The device is expected to take several years to develop. Ultimately, servicemembers will be able to use it simply by driving or flying by the structure under surveillance, Baranoski said.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: concrete; device; gnfi; new; porkys; sense; terahertzwaves; through; walls; will
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-114 next last
To: SampleMan
The shorter the wavelength, the more likely it is to reflect or absorb.

But it also depends on the material. Conductive surfaces tend to reflect all EM. For example, the metal sides of a microwave oven or the walls in an elevator block EM radiation no matter what the frequency.

But for non-metals, it depends a lot more on the frequency and on the material.

61 posted on 01/04/2006 11:56:30 AM PST by Dan Evans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA
Cool!


Bump!
62 posted on 01/04/2006 2:31:00 PM PST by Gucho
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: mysterio

If someone is talking to Al Queda, I want the government to know. And I'd like them to know without creating additional opportunities for leaks!


63 posted on 01/04/2006 2:44:16 PM PST by GOPPachyderm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Badray

"An 'unreasonable' one is"........

also one obtained on false pretenses or evidence, or a blank warrant signed by a judge in advance, too vague in it's description, etc. etc., the sort used constantly NOW!


64 posted on 01/04/2006 4:49:04 PM PST by Richard-SIA ("The natural progress of things is for government to gain ground and for liberty to yield" JEFFERSON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: SandRat; Zacs Mom; PhilDragoo; Happy2BMe; potlatch; ntnychik; Smartass; Boazo; Alamo-Girl; ...

info ping....


65 posted on 01/04/2006 6:12:47 PM PST by bitt ('More bad news for the terrorists: This president is no Lyndon Johnson. He won't quit.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPPachyderm

Even if it means warrantless searching? Push to repeal the Fourth Amendment, then. Or declare martial law.


66 posted on 01/04/2006 6:13:44 PM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: bitt

There goes our privacy, bitt. This is definitely the work of Rumsfeld. Darn that Bush administration!

:)


67 posted on 01/04/2006 7:08:32 PM PST by writer33 (Rush Limbaugh walks in the footsteps of giants: George Washington, Thomas Paine and Ronald Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Watch for the New York Times to publish the blueprints and all technical specifications for the device.


68 posted on 01/04/2006 7:12:02 PM PST by doug from upland (NEW YORK TIMES -- traitorous b*st*rds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Watch for the New York Times to publish the blueprints and all technical specifications for the device.


69 posted on 01/04/2006 7:21:46 PM PST by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

70 posted on 01/04/2006 7:24:44 PM PST by Revolting cat! ("In the end, nothing explains anything.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat; All

Hmm i was wondering when those Xbox and Ps2 gaming tools were going to surface in real time just wait till you all see what's around the corner at every turn .

And you thought you were just playing a Game !


71 posted on 01/04/2006 8:09:45 PM PST by ATOMIC_PUNK (secus acutulus exspiro ab Acheron bipes actio absol ab Acheron supplico)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Normal4me
As I'm sure you know, there is no expressed "right to privacy" in the US Constitution.

The "right to privacy" does exist in at least one STATE Constitution, (Alaska), and the State government froths at the mouth trying to ignore the consequences of a stated "right to privacy", such as the fact Alaskan courts have held up to four ounces of pot are legal under the Alaskan STATE Constitution's "right to privacy".

Already, various states have disallowed the results of blanket sweeps of neighborhoods with thermal detectors looking for pot growers. Under the lack of "probable cause" and violation of the fourth amendment.

Like it or not, there is NO RIGHT TO PRIVACY in the US CONSTITUTION.

The fourth Amendment does not require a warrant, it only requires that a search be "reasonable", whatever the he!! that is.

Don't get me wrong, I am against Orwellian use of these powers.
I am uncomfortable with any US government intrusions into the lives of our citizens, but..., what the he!! else can we do when we are trying to survive as a nation?

The REAL world means we can't always observe the letter of the law. If there is no America, what matters what "rights" we have?

The DEAD have NO RIGHTS.

The rights of American citizens have almost always been "suspended" during ALL of our past WARS, what makes now different?

It sucks, but welcome to reality, otherwise Jefferson Davis's statement that ...(the Confederacy) "died of a theory" will apply to these United States as well.
72 posted on 01/04/2006 8:13:06 PM PST by porkchops 4 mahound ("Si vis pacem, para bellum", If you wish peace, prepare for war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK
Subliminal Conditioning of a new Warrior Caste. < / tongue in cheek
73 posted on 01/04/2006 8:15:22 PM PST by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Richard-SIA

And we act surprised when a study comes out that the majority of high school seniors believe that newspaper stories should have to be approved by the government before publication.


74 posted on 01/04/2006 8:22:28 PM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: porkchops 4 mahound
The fourth Amendment does not require a warrant, it only requires that a search be "reasonable", whatever the he!! that is.

It means a police officer can't do a search unless he has a good reason to believe that the person being searched has committed a crime.

75 posted on 01/04/2006 9:27:56 PM PST by Dan Evans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

He he he


76 posted on 01/04/2006 9:30:06 PM PST by ATOMIC_PUNK (secus acutulus exspiro ab Acheron bipes actio absol ab Acheron supplico)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

I swiping that hope ya dont mind !


77 posted on 01/04/2006 9:34:19 PM PST by ATOMIC_PUNK (secus acutulus exspiro ab Acheron bipes actio absol ab Acheron supplico)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
Put me on the team Coach.

Cheers,

knewshound
78 posted on 01/04/2006 9:37:51 PM PST by knews_hound (Now with two handed typing !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: porkchops 4 mahound
what the he!! else can we do when we are trying to survive as a nation?

One thing that we can do is change peoples attitudes about allowing private citizens to enforce the law. This is a big taboo with a lot of people and the idea is usually scoffed at and derided. Many think it is outright illegal and dangerous.

Let's change the laws so that we can help the government do things that they are prohibited by the constitution from doing. Give us back the right to wiretap, keep dossiers on suspicious characters, exchange information on terrorists and criminals.

If the government is prohibited from measuring radiation from buildings then let us do it. If they can't wiretap the crooks, we should be allowed to. The Constitution restricts the government, not the people.

79 posted on 01/04/2006 9:38:59 PM PST by Dan Evans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Dan Evans
Yes, that is what it is supposed to mean.

(Subject to the interpretation of the courts, which is why there is "some" doubt.)
80 posted on 01/04/2006 9:39:58 PM PST by porkchops 4 mahound ("Si vis pacem, para bellum", If you wish peace, prepare for war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-114 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson