Posted on 01/03/2006 1:24:28 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
Speculation is mounting that Google will this week unveil a no-frills personal computer costing as little as $200
Dominic Timms
Tuesday January 3, 2006
Speculation is mounting that Page will use a keynote speech at the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas on Friday to unveil details of a low-cost computer or internet-enabled device that will run on a new operating system developed by Google.
Because the device - similar in concept to the Mac Mini unveiled last year by Apple's Steve Jobs - doesn't use Microsoft's Windows, it could cost as little as $200.
Despite its low price it would enable users to collect and store internet-delivered content such as films, music and photos then show it on TV.
According to the LA Times, Google will announce details of the new device at CES, where it could also unveil its partnership with Wal Mart to sell the machines.
The report follows comments made by US analysts just before Christmas, suggesting Google would expand into hardware.
In a briefing note, Bear Stearns analyst Robert Peck said the US online giant would launch Google Cubes - simple network-based boxes that could link and control home entertainment, computer and automation systems.
"In fact, Google could over time become more of a hardware company than anything else," Mr Peck said.
The idea of network computing - where dumb terminals connect to a network pulling down applications where necessary - has been around since the early days of the PC, .......
(Excerpt) Read more at media.guardian.co.uk ...
BTTT
The PC at this point is MORE powerful than the minicomputers (remember those?) that it replaced. It replaced those because it was faster, cheaper and simpler - albeit not quite as powerful.
The wheel has come full circle. It's now easy to imagine a faster/cheaper/simpler OS than WindowsXP. Very easy.
Linux is faster/cheaper (but not simpler) and has 10% of the market, mostly servers where faster is very important and cheaper is potentially a bigger deal ('cause Windows Data Center Edition is a lot more than $200 bucks.)
Even if G-OS is only cheaper/simpler there is probably a market for it. Linux tried be cheaper/simpler but failed. Too much legacy UNIX cr*p showing through for Joe Sixpack. But that doesn't make it an impossible problem.
I vote for Gooie.
Ironically, Microsoft is more scared of google then the other way around.
Googles error may be hubris, but microsoft is right to be scared, Google is now the bigger company and it more competitive in terms of atttracting talent then microsoft is (they even landed one of microsofts top execs).
That said, AOLs search is powered by google, with its recent deal and agreement with Time Warner.
In other words, advertising.
Like a giant billboard.
In that case, they will get even bigger.
They can guarantee more people will see your ads or banners or what not, then anyone else can or possibly will.
And last I checked, billboards still bring in money.
Calm down and take the blue pill. It's OK.
This thread is about Google. Can you say Google? G-o-o-o-o-g-g-g-g-l-l-l-l-e-e-e.
See? I knew you could. ;-)
Right!
It will be interesting to see if they are thinking outside of the box that many here are still within!
The PC has been such a constant for so long!
I'll ne impressed when the google search engine begins to talk to us, then argue with us, demand the right to vote, etc.
"Yeah I know he should have backed it up, but who really does this"
If I told you how many hundreds of gigabytes of external HD space I have, you'd faint.
I have backups of backups plus countless CDs of saved graphics.
Even my laptops have hot-swap HD bays in case the primary drive crashes.
I can usually get into safe into mode long enough to recover/transfer my irreplacable data.
I had a WebTV back when they first came out.
[They were great for flame wars conducted within the firewalled groups]....;D
"Google already gives you a GB of space for gmail"
I will not even allow *any* Google cookies on my machines, much less have them archiving my personal data.
I wouldn't use Gmail if you paid me to.
http://www.google-watch.org/
Enjoy....:)
An excellent suggestion, and a very smart use of the USB drives.
And we see with GMail that Google has a good experience base by now with offering online storage...there could be interesting synchronicity between a Google thin client box with Google OS, Google Desktop, Google Search, Gmail, etc etc etc...for many people of MODEST computing needs such a network-computing device leveraging well-integrated useability with the familiarity of the Google name might seem quite attractive.
To this technically-aware (but not exactly extremely IT-savvy) person, it seems to me that the concept of a "thin client" computer using Google is like going back in time to the times of mainframe/minicomputer terminals where we all use individual clients to access the functions on the main computer.
Of course the connection speeds differ and we are dealing with different types of networks, but still it sounds more like "back to the future". And I found one IT article that says essentially the same things:
http://www.cnet.com/4520-6033_1-5759958-1.html
What if you had to buy software for your cell phone, boot it each time you turn it on, install applications, update software, and then try and use it daily. Since the answer is no, you just want to use the cell phone, you probably don't know that the software in the cell phone is updated transparently by the network, without you doing anything. What you want to do and all you care about is the phone works.
So the modern thin client is a bigger cell phone that connects to the net and has a browser as it's main application ... all most people really need, or want. The rest of the software you want to use, it's available on line from many suppliers. Store your files on a USB thumb-drive or on line. You subscribe to what you want.
Techies will still buy PCs, but the vast majority of people who just want to use the Internet will buy IMHO thin clients, ie the Internet cell phone. An ideal situation for developing countries. Gonna happen, as net speeds go up, it's going to be sooner rather than later. Too much hassle for the average Joe in keeping their PC running, the less technically savvy, the more likely the customer. Probably be nothing more than a swap out for your current cable box -- or a version of this.
I have DirecTV tivo, it works just like this, all it needs is a display to be a fully functioning Internet terminal.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.