Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: VRWCmember
So does that mean that if you found Precambrian rabbit fossils then evolution would be disproven?

Yes.
69 posted on 01/03/2006 2:09:12 PM PST by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]


To: Dimensio
So does that mean that if you found Precambrian rabbit fossils then evolution would be disproven?
Yes.

Until we change the assumptions of the theory to accommodate precambrian rabbit fossils because we cannot accept a result that contradicts our foundational assumptions accepting the theory of evolution. So upon discovering precambrian rabbit fossils we modify the theory to explain how even though this previously would have been considered to disprove evolution, now it only serves to further support the theory. Now, rather than the theory of evolution, we have evolution of the theory.

74 posted on 01/03/2006 2:21:18 PM PST by VRWCmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson