Illustrating the intellectual strength of your argument by citing the most outrageous quotes you can find of your opposition is not exactly an example of arguing from a strong position. I have seen comments and rationale FOR evolution and against creation/ID/scientific creationism (or whatever else you might wish to call it) that show the same level of ignorance as the quotes you listed.
If I were to attempt to evaluate the article posted, I would start with the first sentence that claims that the theory of evolution is the "foundation" of biology. That sentence is about as accurate as saying that the Laffer Curve is the "foundation" of economics. The various theories of Evolution make up a branch of biological inquiry, but to assert that evolution is the foundation of biology is just plain wrong, especially when the "disprovability" argument against creation science as a scientific study can just as easily be made regarding evolution. Either position (evolution or creation) requires acceptance of assumptions or ideas that can neither be proven nor disproven by scientific experimentation to interpret the data or evidence available.