Think about the statue scenario very carefully, particularly about the priors and assumptions that you are using. You do not even understand your own argument, so it is unlikely that you will ever understand mine.
"Blah blah blah. You're so smart and I'm so dumb. Blah blah blah. I'm so smart and you're so dumb. Blah blah blah."
That's fairly well been your argument so far. Got anything else?
And with this, I think it is time for me to end my long run on FR. It was fun but I have ventures to run, research to finish, classes to teach, and a life to live. More often than not, the time spent posting here is not worth the effort, even if modestly entertaining and occasionally quite enjoyable. I owe beers to many.
As I've updated my profile to reflect, I am moving on. I am a doer rather than a talker, and FR has taken up far too much "doing" time. I'm sure those ever vigilant against atheistic communistic math and science will appreciate the respite as well. I have history to write and an obligation to drag humanity kicking and screaming into the future whether they like it or not.
Cheers!
(lurk mode engaged)