Skip to comments.
Pace Warns 2006 Will be 'Bad Year' for U.S. Enemies
AFPS ^
| January 2 2005
| Jim Garamone
Posted on 01/02/2006 7:28:29 PM PST by jmc1969
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
Anyone want to take odds on catching Osama or Zarqawi?
And, I guess Pace is also predicting a bad Mid-term election for the dems. I liked Myers, but I like Pace better.
1
posted on
01/02/2006 7:28:31 PM PST
by
jmc1969
To: jmc1969
Hopefully bad for internal enemies as well.
2
posted on
01/02/2006 7:30:14 PM PST
by
Mr. Mojo
To: Mr. Mojo
"Hopefully bad for internal enemies as well."
Dittos to that!
3
posted on
01/02/2006 7:34:23 PM PST
by
hsalaw
To: Dog; Coop; Valin; AdmSmith
4
posted on
01/02/2006 7:35:10 PM PST
by
nuconvert
(No More Axis of Evil by Christmas ! TLR) [there's a lot of bad people in the pistachio business])
To: jmc1969
Pace Warns 2006 Will be 'Bad Year' for U.S. Enemies Not if the MSM has anything to say about it ...
5
posted on
01/02/2006 7:36:03 PM PST
by
TexGuy
To: humblegunner; Eaker; TheMom; thackney; Xenalyte
Pace Warns 2006 Will be 'Bad Year' for U.S. EnemiesBad enemies! No salsa for you.
6
posted on
01/02/2006 7:38:33 PM PST
by
Flyer
(Does anyone ever PULL the envelope?)
To: jmc1969
I am not that optimistic, but I would guess there will be less attacks by terrorists in Iraq for 2006 compared to the following years, based on data.
7
posted on
01/02/2006 7:38:52 PM PST
by
Wiz
To: Mr. Mojo
Iran, Iran, Iran. It's going to be a beautiful Spring.
To: jmc1969
Mullahs in Iran, this is where the focus must be, as they are building nukes and are allies of Al Qaeda. They would love nothing more than to nuke NYC and D.C., taking down the Great Satan.
They must be stopped.
9
posted on
01/02/2006 7:40:54 PM PST
by
tomahawk
To: tomahawk
My sentiments exactly. This is the focus. This is the mission.
To: Wiz
But, I think there could be a big one in Europe or another Western country. Zarqawi is going to want to make up for less attacks in Iraq for more attacks elsewhere that will of course get more media then attacks in Iraq.
11
posted on
01/02/2006 7:42:52 PM PST
by
jmc1969
To: jmc1969
Does this include the NYT,ComPost? and NewsLeak?
To: jmc1969
I have the feeling that Gen. Pace is a man of small physical stature but has huge cajones.
13
posted on
01/02/2006 7:45:14 PM PST
by
jazusamo
(A Progressive is only a Socialist in a transparent disguise.)
To: jmc1969
Could be. Iraq is done from a Global War perspective. Iran is the epicenter. Those bastards are killing our boys. They are funding the terrorists. Where is the Bush Doctrine? Cut off the head, save our boys... Quit screwing around.
To: jmc1969
15
posted on
01/02/2006 7:48:28 PM PST
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ... Monthly Donor spoken Here. Go to ... https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: jmc1969
16
posted on
01/02/2006 7:52:02 PM PST
by
Liberty Valance
("Can't hide Freedom's song." ~ Starwise)
To: jazusamo
I have the feeling that Gen. Pace is a man of small physical stature but has huge cajones.
--
Actually , he's a fairly good sized man. Rummy and the prior JCS, Richard Myers with General Pace are shown in this picture.
17
posted on
01/02/2006 7:52:49 PM PST
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ... Monthly Donor spoken Here. Go to ... https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: hsalaw
To: jmc1969
The odds of catching Zarqawi are well over 90%. His 'habitat for inhumanity' has been shrinking rapidly, and he's almost certainly running out of safe places to hide. Further, I suspect it'll be the Iraqis who catch him, and they almost certainly won't be taking him alive. I'm guessing that Wolf Brigade gets him before mid summer, and he's killed 'resisting arrest' or with a suicide vest.
As far as Bin Laden, all I'll say is that I assess the odds of a kill or capture to be closer to 15%.
19
posted on
01/02/2006 7:55:22 PM PST
by
Steel Wolf
(If the Founders had wanted the President to be spying on our phone calls, they would have said so!)
To: NormsRevenge
I believe you are correct. I was used to seeing him stand next to Gen. Myers and always had the impression he was on the small side.
20
posted on
01/02/2006 7:58:45 PM PST
by
jazusamo
(A Progressive is only a Socialist in a transparent disguise.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson