Terrorist Nukes in America

[cmsgop]

[BenLurkin]

Thank goodness San Francisco is not on their list.

We mustn't let the enemy find out that San Francisco is the secret headquarters of the international zionist crusader cabal.

[TADSLOS]

You need to cite your source.

[69ConvertibleFirebird]

Damn! I got a similar thing from my second cousin's husband's brother's son's wife's mother's sister-in-law.

Although an excellent source (my second cousin's husband's brother's son's wife's mother's sister-in-law) I'm not sure I believe that there are functional nukes available. Dirty bombs, yes.

[oceanview]

we've been over this again and again on various FR threads.

[TexasPatriot8]

Who is that? Looks like Brooks, or Dunn. I always get them confused. Brooks I think. :)

[RightWhale]

A real stomach churner. Some of us have been living under threat of total thermonuclear annihilation since the 50s. The main problem with the new threat is that it will be hard to identify a worthy target to incinerate. Otherwise, it is a weak cousin to the real thing.

[cmsgop]

No,Thats Paul Williams..........

[ex-Texan]

San Francisco most certainly is on the hit list. The image of the Golden Gate Bridge being demolished by an atomic blast has been seen on the web more than once. 'Nuff said.

[TexasPatriot8]

I'm trying to track the source down.

[vigilante2]

 http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1546635/posts

[BenLurkin]

Oh no . . . the secret is out!

[TexasPatriot8]

Okay, whatever. I keep pretty well informed on things from the radio, TV, net, etc., and this was the first time I had seen something so detailed and specific, including names of people in government and intelligence who went on the record backing up the assertions in the article. It's hardly speculation and opinion. As for no functional nukes in the States. I personally know someone who worked in military intelligence in the 70s and 80s, and he has said bluntly that the CIA and NSA knew of dozens of Soviet sleeper cells in the U.S., and their greatest fear was that they smuggled in small nukes to use at key targets as part of a preemptive strike if it ever came to that. That article touches on that also.

If you've seen something that debunks the content of that article, I'd love to see it, but just because it's not first hand, doesn't mean it's not credible. NO ONE posts first hand information here, so just because I got this from my cousin's husband who's very active politically doesn't make it slop. I'd heard chit chat about nukes in the U.S. for years since 9-11, but nothing as detailed as that article I posted complete with names of people in government who went on the record. Had you? And, I said I was new, so if it was old, I didn't know. That's why I said it. :)

[sionnsar]

The other cities monitored include Chicago, Detroit, Las Vegas, New York, and Seattle.

If they take out Seattle, Washington will become a red state.

[TexasPatriot8]

Boy he really dropped some pounds. Doesn't look like I remember when I saw him in a movie years ago.

[Marine_Uncle]

Welcome to Free Republic. Hope your stay is informative as well as fun. As indicated by oceanview, we have waded through this info a number of times. But one can share your concerns.

[TexasPatriot8]

Well, like I said, I'm new, so I wouldn't have read or seen various other FR threads. :) Next time, I'll read every thread and post on FR for the past few years before I make my first post. Geesh. No slack for newies huh? :)

[69ConvertibleFirebird]

If they take out Seattle, Washington will become a red state.

So this could be a ***Republican scheme...***

[oceanview]

this is an unsourced assertion, you have to expect some rebuttal. what's your next thread going to be, a cousin who told you aliens landed at Roswell in 1948?