Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: expatpat
Pat. I must respectfully disagree with your analysis.

When we suggest that a nation (spell tribe) can and will recognize a mortal threat -- and take actions required for its survival -- certain assumptions are implicit in the thesis:

1. That the nature and identity of the "threat" is definitive; with clear options available in addressal thereof. Incremental demographic shifts -- with attendant social and cultural modifications to the tribal makeup -- make such options ever more difficult. (Who and where is the "enemy", etc...)

2. Building a consensus for unified action against the threat becomes ever more difficult -- if not impossible.

It seems to me that the biggest enemies Western Civilization has in this conflict with Islam are, in fact, TIME and an attendant diminution of NATIONAL WILL.

Happy New Year to all.
24 posted on 01/02/2006 1:44:13 PM PST by dk/coro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: dk/coro
In the UK, the 'enemy' is the Pakistani, in France it is the NA Arab, in Germany, the Turk, and so on.....

When the time is ripe, there will be politicians who will use it as an opportunity, and help develop a consensus.

36 posted on 01/02/2006 4:42:05 PM PST by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson