Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush retreats to ranch, readies to launch agenda
NY Times/timesargus ^ | January 1, 2006 | DAVID E. SANGER

Posted on 01/01/2006 12:32:44 PM PST by ncountylee

CRAWFORD, Texas — For six days, President Bush has stayed in nearly complete isolation on his ranch here — just mountain-biking and brush-clearing, the White House insisted daily, and seeing only one visitor, his mother-in-law, Jenna Welch. He never even ventured into this little town of 600, not even to the cheeseburger joint that he often uses as a political tool to show that he is in touch with his neighbors.

But on New Year's Day, after a brief stop at an Army hospital in San Antonio to visit wounded soldiers, Bush is scheduled to return to the White House earlier than usual from his break and start a campaign to set the tone for 2006 and, perhaps, the remainder of his presidency.

As part of an ambitious strategy the White House has mapped out for the next four weeks, Bush has scheduled two major speeches — one on the economy on Friday in Chicago, another on Iraq — ahead of the State of the Union address, which is tentatively scheduled for Jan. 31. By the time he appears before Congress, Bush's aides are hoping, two of the immediate challenges the president faces — the Supreme Court confirmation hearings of Judge Samuel A. Alito Jr. and the permanent renewal of the Patriot Act — will be behind him.

(Excerpt) Read more at timesargus.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2006agenda; bamc; biasedheadline; bush; bush43; davidesanger; davidsanger; godblessourpresident; mediacraticparty; newyorktimes; nye; nyt; nytimes; nytimesbias; prairiechapel; sanger; westernwhitehouse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241 next last
To: ncountylee
....not even to the cheeseburger joint that he often uses as a political tool to show that he is in touch with his neighbors.

Why, I'm sure that this is exactly the way that this scumbag NY Times columnist writes about his Democrats when, for example, they show up at sporting goods stores and inquire, "Is this where I can get me a huntin' license?"

221 posted on 01/04/2006 5:09:23 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
If Kristol is right

It would be a first.

222 posted on 01/04/2006 5:11:06 PM PST by M. Thatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
That is the 'subliminable' message that the Times is seeking to convey.

Absolutely correct.
Ar the NY Times, Democrat politicians take "well-deserved breaks".

223 posted on 01/04/2006 5:11:27 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
Time to leave this thread and find some grown-ups to discuss things with..

Hmmm, when I left, what was it you said....

Well, I don't wonder why either of you ran from this fight. You could not defend your positions, so you lashed out instead with weak attacks on me

Hmmm, attacks like this

...you're one of the dumbest people I've ever encountered in five years...

or maybe this:

I prefer to think of you as difficult and a total jerk

or perhaps this

anyone calling himself a conservative could be as completely stupid as you're being ...

You mean lashing out with those kind of attacks on me? You do remember that was you, right?

What were you saying about honesty, character, and principle? Did that include hypocrisy?

Dolt.

224 posted on 01/04/2006 5:12:06 PM PST by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
Wolfstar, do have any idea what's wrong with these people?

Yep, but I can't say it in polite company. ;-)

Well...one thing I can say in polite company is that they take themselves, and their interaction with strangers on the internet, waaaaaay too seriously. I mean, look at all the real, worrisome news out there. Sharon may be dying. That crackpot in Iran is threatening nuclear anihilation. The three crackpots in Latin America are proving that the tradition of Leftist dictators there is alive and kicking. Washington is about ready to go into its latest inside-the-beltway scandal in an attempt to force yet another President's eye off the ball of national security in a dangerous world. The New York Times found a way to blame President Bush for the mess in that West Virginia mining town.

All that, and more is in the news today, but the dweeb is worried about what he thinks some stranger on an internet forum said about him. If that's not the definition of taking oneself too seriously, I don't know what is.

225 posted on 01/04/2006 5:14:43 PM PST by Wolfstar ("We must...all hang together or...we shall all hang separately." Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar
Principled, are you still going on about whether or not I called you, personally, a Bush hater?

No, that was someone else. I am not a bush hater.

226 posted on 01/04/2006 5:16:08 PM PST by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou

Clinton used McDonald's to keep "in touch" ... although I would say he was more intimately in touch when he ordered pizza with Monica into the WH!


227 posted on 01/04/2006 5:17:23 PM PST by GOPPachyderm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar
... but the dweeb is worried about what he thinks some stranger on an internet forum said about him.

Maybe you're wrong about that. Ever consider it?

Could it be that the person of whom you speak is not at all worried? That maybe you've *gasp* erred?

Why then, you say, would someone defend themselves from being called a bush-hater? If you're asking that then you do miss the point.

The point is not whether you call someone a bush hater, it is whether you're willing to allow and/or accept any critical point of view.

It's my bet that's what the poster had in mind, and I'm awfully sure he didn't give a damn about what some anonymous person on the web thinks of his/her anonymous posts. That would be stupid.....

228 posted on 01/04/2006 5:22:09 PM PST by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee
An EXCELLENT article...

I will use it to educate my son about how to spot biased news reporting...then it will line the bird cage very well.

229 posted on 01/04/2006 5:26:56 PM PST by I'm ALL Right! (ENDOFTHESPEAR.COM "He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain that which he cannot lose.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Principled; ohioWfan
Unless someone is using your screen name, you posted the following to me this morning:

The GWB haters around here are not going to post to you anymore.

I am not a Bush hater. What indicates to you that I am? Or did you just jump without thinking? BTW that's a likely groupthink behavior - jumping without first looking.

I criticized the president for ignoring immigration concerns. How is that a GWB hater?

I said the repubs are open to attacks on SS and taxes because the dems prevented SS and tax reform so far. How is that being a GWB hater?

Really, how is it?

148 posted on 01/04/2006 9:03:04 AM PST by Principled

After a series of posts on the matter, you're now denying it was you. To which I only care to reply, yeah, right. Whatever.

230 posted on 01/04/2006 5:28:10 PM PST by Wolfstar ("We must...all hang together or...we shall all hang separately." Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar

I am not a Bush hater. Why are you so fixated on insisting it? What's wrong with you?


231 posted on 01/04/2006 5:31:36 PM PST by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar
After a series of posts on the matter, you're now denying it was you.

No. That's wrong. I am denying being a Bush hater. Why must you persist in your delusions?

232 posted on 01/04/2006 5:32:56 PM PST by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar
Can one not criticize the administration/president/republican party without being a bush hater? Apparently not to you.

I criticized the president. Now I am a Bush hater? Only to you.

233 posted on 01/04/2006 5:37:02 PM PST by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar

I and so many tire of the vicious personal attacks by those refusing to hear any criticism of the President, the administration, or the party. How the heck can we identify areas for improvement? (or maybe to you, there are no areas for improvement?).


234 posted on 01/04/2006 5:39:43 PM PST by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar

I think the president should be criticized on immigration and your vitriol and personal attacks will not deter it. Get over it.


235 posted on 01/04/2006 5:40:53 PM PST by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee

This is not journalism, it's pure propaganda. I'm not sure he could have written a more biased article.


236 posted on 01/04/2006 5:42:00 PM PST by I'm ALL Right! (ENDOFTHESPEAR.COM "He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain that which he cannot lose.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I'm ALL Right!
educate my son about how to spot biased news reporting...

The next time a lib friend claims that there is no media bias, this article becomes a trump card.

I emailed to two lib friends and the one that I have heard from could only claim "well this is just one guy."

237 posted on 01/04/2006 5:42:52 PM PST by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: Principled
MOZART for YOUR MIND

Track #5, Sonata in D for Two Pianos (It's only $11.98 on Amazon......a steal of a deal!)

Listen to it for TEN minutes before you sign on to FR, and it will increase your mental capacity, and save you from yourself on threads like this.

Your reading will improve, you'll understand what people are actually saying (i.e. comprehension) instead of reacting with unbridled emotion, and you'll feel MUCH better about yourself, so you stop imagining that people are attacking you (You see, I didn't say you were dumb.........I concluded that you were just being a jerk.........and you are. NO one is as dumb as you are acting right now. Comprehension is the name of the game, son).

Mozart. Give it a try. G'nite! :)

238 posted on 01/04/2006 6:35:16 PM PST by ohioWfan (PROUD Mom of an Iraq War VET! THANKS, son!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar
You vicious, vicious person you.......... how could you SAY those awful things??

Oh, wait a minute! 75% of that post was a quote from the OTHER guy! You didn't say anything nasty at all! LOL!

239 posted on 01/04/2006 6:37:06 PM PST by ohioWfan (PROUD Mom of an Iraq War VET! THANKS, son!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: Principled

I guess I am among those who have been abusing you. I again apologize but it is your fault for hanging out with the wrong crowd. Didn't your parents warn you about that? :-)


240 posted on 01/04/2006 10:00:52 PM PST by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all that needs to be done needs to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson