Maybe you're wrong about that. Ever consider it?
Could it be that the person of whom you speak is not at all worried? That maybe you've *gasp* erred?
Why then, you say, would someone defend themselves from being called a bush-hater? If you're asking that then you do miss the point.
The point is not whether you call someone a bush hater, it is whether you're willing to allow and/or accept any critical point of view.
It's my bet that's what the poster had in mind, and I'm awfully sure he didn't give a damn about what some anonymous person on the web thinks of his/her anonymous posts. That would be stupid.....
The GWB haters around here are not going to post to you anymore.I am not a Bush hater. What indicates to you that I am? Or did you just jump without thinking? BTW that's a likely groupthink behavior - jumping without first looking.
I criticized the president for ignoring immigration concerns. How is that a GWB hater?
I said the repubs are open to attacks on SS and taxes because the dems prevented SS and tax reform so far. How is that being a GWB hater?
Really, how is it?
148 posted on 01/04/2006 9:03:04 AM PST by Principled
After a series of posts on the matter, you're now denying it was you. To which I only care to reply, yeah, right. Whatever.