How the NY Times is Ringing in 2006 (Risen book release now Jan. 3)

michellemalkin.com ^ | December 31, 2005 | Michelle Malkin

[new yorker 77]

Yes, it's New Year's Eve. And since there's no rest for the NYTimes, I'm not taking it easy tonight either.

You see, NYTimes' reporter James Risen has been a busy bee over the holidays. The co-author of the infamous Chicken Little opus exposing the NSA special collection program to monitor international communications between suspected al Qaeda operatives and their contacts will be launching his new book, State of War, on January 3.

Turns out the publisher of Risen's new book, which includes a discussion of NSA eavesdropping, has moved up the publication date to this coming Tuesday. (It was originally scheduled for release in mid-January.)

NYT ombudsman Byron Calame lets us all know that he's having trouble getting any information out of his bosses and colleagues:

THE New York Times's explanation of its decision to report, after what it said was a one-year delay, that the National Security Agency is eavesdropping domestically without court-approved warrants was woefully inadequate. And I have had unusual difficulty getting a better explanation for readers, despite the paper's repeated pledges of greater transparency. For the first time since I became public editor, the executive editor and the publisher have declined to respond to my requests for information about news-related decision-making. My queries concerned the timing of the exclusive Dec. 16 article about President Bush's secret decision in the months after 9/11 to authorize the warrantless eavesdropping on Americans in the United States.

I e-mailed a list of 28 questions to Bill Keller, the executive editor, on Dec. 19, three days after the article appeared. He promptly declined to respond to them. I then sent the same questions to Arthur Sulzberger Jr., the publisher, who also declined to respond. They held out no hope for a fuller explanation in the future...

...On the larger question of why the eavesdropping article finally appeared when it did, a couple of possibilities intrigue me.

One is that Times editors said they discovered there was more concern inside the government about the eavesdropping than they had initially been told. Mr. Keller's prepared statements said that "a year ago," officials "assured senior editors of The Times that a variety of legal checks had been imposed that satisfied everyone involved that the program raised no legal questions." So the paper "agreed not to publish at that time" and continued reporting.

But in the months that followed, Mr. Keller said, "we developed a fuller picture of the concerns and misgivings that had been expressed during the life of the program" and "it became clear those questions loomed larger within the government than we had previously understood."

The impact of a new book about intelligence by Mr. Risen on the timing of the article is difficult to gauge. The book, "State of War: The Secret History of the CIA and the Bush Administration," was not mentioned in the Dec. 16 article. Mr. Keller asserted in the shorter of his two statements that the article wasn't timed to the forthcoming book, and that "its origins and publication are completely independent of Jim's book."

The publication of Mr. Risen's book, with its discussion of the eavesdropping operation, was scheduled for mid-January - but has now been moved up to Tuesday. Despite Mr. Keller's distancing of The Times from "State of War," Mr. Risen's publisher told me on Dec. 21 that the paper's Washington bureau chief had talked to her twice in the previous 30 days about the book.

So it seems to me the paper was quite aware that it faced the possibility of being scooped by its own reporter's book in about four weeks. But the key question remains: To what extent did the book cause top editors to shrug off the concerns that had kept them from publishing the eavesdropping article for months?

A final note: If Mr. Risen's book or anything else of substance should open any cracks in the stone wall surrounding the handling of the eavesdropping article, I will have my list of 28 questions (35 now, actually) ready to e-mail again to Mr. Keller...

Hey, speaking of transparency, why doesn't Mr. Calame publish his 35 questions so the rest of us can see what his bosses refuse to answer?

Contact Calame:

• E-mail: public@nytimes.com
• Phone: (212) 556-7652
• Address: Public Editor
The New York Times
229 West 43rd St.
New York, NY 10036-3959

***

Meanwhile, here's the latest attempt by Risen and NYTimes colleague Eric Lichtblau to portray President Bush as King George, scheduled for Sunday Jan. 1 publication. The online headline and lead paragraph read:

Justice Deputy Resisted Parts of Spy Program WASHINGTON, Dec. 31 - The top deputy to then-Attorney General John Ashcroft refused two years ago to approve important parts of the secret program that allows domestic eavesdropping without warrants, prompting two leading White House aides to try to win the needed approval from Mr. Ashcroft himself while he was hospitalized after a gall bladder operation, according to officials knowledgeable about the episode.

With Mr. Ashcroft recuperating from gall bladder surgery in March 2004, his deputy, James B. Comey, who was then acting as attorney general, was unwilling to give his certification to crucial aspects of the classified program, as required under the procedures set up by the White House, said the officials, who asked for anonymity because the program is classified and they are not authorized to discuss it publicly...

Nice try at nefarious spin. Two words: Big deal. So, an underling filling in for his boss doesn't want to sign off on a major, national security decision. Where's the controversy?

You want to talk about controversy? Where are these continued leaks coming from? Looks like there are blabbermouths inside the Justice Department who seem quite comfy with Risen and Lichtblau. Seems to me this raises some serious conflict-of-interest concerns regarding the DOJ probe of the NSA leaks.

Continuing a bit down in paragraphs 6-8, we learn the real headline news:

It was unclear whether the White House ultimately persuaded Mr. Ashcroft to approve the program or whether the White House moved ahead without his concurrence. What is known is that in early 2004, about the time of the hospital meeting, the White House suspended parts of the surveillance program for several months and moved ahead with more stringent requirements on the National Security Agency on how the program was used, in part to guard against possible abuses. The Justice Department's concerns appear to have led, at least in part, to the suspension, and it was the Justice Department that oversaw an audit conducted on the program.

The audit examined a selection of cases to see how the N.S.A. went about determining that it had probable cause to believe that someone in the United States, including American citizens, had sufficient ties to Al Qaeda to justify the extraordinary step of eavesdropping on their phone calls and e-mail messages without a court warrant. That review is not known to have found any instances of documented abuses.

So, "King George" went to extraordinary lengths to seek the DOJ's approval, suspended parts of the program to address civil liberties concerns, subjected the program to more stringent NSA requirements, and submitted to an audit that is not known to have found any instances of documented abuses.

Somehow, I doubt this will make it onto the nightly news...or into Arlen Specter's talking points.

[freekitty]

I wonder what Spector and his kind have to gain by doing these sort of pranks?

[new yorker 77]

No one cares what mumbles thinks or says.

Give me John Roberts, Samuel Alito on the SCOTUS.

Hold the Senate majority in the 2006 Election so Dubya can replace Stevens or Ginsburg when they retire or expire.

Libs will cringe when the GOP gains in '06 with the courts hanging in the balance.

Eye on the prize.

Roberts-Alito-And ?

The NSA LEAK will expose the libs. No amount of FAKE HEADLINES will help them.

[wvobiwan]

Excellent advice. The SCOTUS is 1st priority. Reforming congress is number 2, get rid of the RINOs and keep marginalizing the libs.

Spectre should never have been allowed to be re-elected, much less get his chair on the Justice committee. He's a RINO like McCain - men and women like these are NO DIFFERENT THAN DEMS and looney liberals.

[goresalooza]

"The NSA LEAK will expose the libs. No amount of FAKE HEADLINES will help them.
"

BINGO. And when America finds out it's likely that intel committee member Sen Rockefeller (with a BIG DUMB D after his name)--WV did all the leaking....there WILL be "hell to pay." I use that phrase out of respect to Barbara Olsen and her book of the same title.

I cannot wait to find out who leaked. We already know why they leaked, but who is responsible?

[penowa]

I wonder what Spector and his kind have to gain by doing these sort of pranks?

Snarlen' Arlen owes the ones who brung him - and I don't mean the ones who helped squeak him by in the primary. (Santorum and Bush)

[driftless]

You better believe that if the Times had access to info on the Manhattan Project during WWII, they would have printed it. They have absolutely no integrity. Proving once again, overwhelmingly, that libs cannot be trusted with national security.

[Arizona Carolyn]

Does Katie Couric have him booked for the whole week??

[Jonah Johansen]

I firmly believe if the President had the Attorney General arrest and charge the NYT publisher, editor, these reporters and the book's author, hold them without bail and charge them with capital crimes such as conspiracy and espionage the media would go nuts for three days, then the overwhelming backlash of the public and the realization that they could be next would sink in, and their tune would change. Ultimately they are all cowards.
I think if the Republicans had the courage to call treason, treason and the Democratic party and their media allies traitors. Instead of fighting , GE, Disney, and Viacom would cave in and clean house. It is tough to sell advertising when a majority of the country see you as aiding our enemies. The administration needs to take American's vague feelings of betrayal and put a big red circle around it by arresting these traitors.

The treason of the media exists because it has not been confronted and made to pay a price.

[RAldrich]

"I wonder what Spector and his kind have to gain by doing these sort of pranks?"

They gain fawning coverage in the MSM. They seem to feel that the MSM is more powerful - can do more to help them or hurt them - than just plain, common-sense folks like us.

[Loyal Buckeye]

A great majority of the American people will come back from their Christmas breaks and be in no mood to hear the insanity coming from the RATS and the MSM.

[bert]

.....The treason of the media exists because it has not been confronted and made to pay a price......

You are right on target.

The coming war between the President and the Old Media (formerly the Main Stream Media) will not be undertaken lightly. The Presidency is at stake. If Bush loses we will end up with a parlimentary government. If the OGW loses or is severely maimed, the Democrat Party will disintegrate. The nation will be catapulted into a new era.

I'm betting on a new era. W has chosen the ground and undoubtedly has a combined arms attack ready to shove off.

There can be no plea bargining in a war.

[Logical me]

I hope the President Bush comes out swinging and fast and hard. The more time this is delayed the more the RATS will continue to push. I hope the JD issues subpoenas immediately and will bring in a few dozen NYTs types including the reporters. And due to the disclosure the Times made which involves national security, that if the source is not disclosed, jail time. This time it should be for many years. This has to be pursued hard and fast or it will just fade and nothing will be done.

[r-q-tek86]

ping

[GloriaJane]

"The treason of the media exists because it has not been confronted and made to pay a price."

It's sad to say, but I don't think they'll pay that price unless enough of us makes a big enough stink all across the country to push for it.

[tet68]

However, neither Comey or any other top Justice Department official would confirm the story on the record, relegating the claim to rumor status.

This from NewsMax.

[RobbyS]

Power. Spector is a self-important b..d with cancer. IOW, he is tetched in the head.

[p23185]

I firmly believe if the President had the Attorney General arrest and charge the NYT publisher, editor, these reporters and the book's author, hold them without bail and charge them with capital crimes such as conspiracy and espionage the media would go nuts for three days, then the overwhelming backlash of the public and the realization that they could be next would sink in, and their tune would change. Ultimately they are all cowards. I think if the Republicans had the courage to call treason, treason and the Democratic party and their media allies traitors. Instead of fighting , GE, Disney, and Viacom would cave in and clean house. It is tough to sell advertising when a majority of the country see you as aiding our enemies. The administration needs to take American's vague feelings of betrayal and put a big red circle around it by arresting these traitors. The treason of the media exists because it has not been confronted and made to pay a price.

Well said, I only wish the Bush Administration would make the charges and haul these a$$holes off to prison. Hold for a long time and let them all squeal about not getting a hasty trial - like Tom Delay. The TX justice department seems to be dragging that out as long a possible, Bush should take a lesson from that experience.

[Mind-numbed Robot]

Proving once again, overwhelmingly, that libs cannot be trusted with national security.

Just as important is why they can't be trusted. They are the enemy within the gates. How can you trust the enemy to defend you against themselves. Fox/Henhouse.