Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush defends spying while visiting wounded troops
Associated Press via HoustonChronicle.com ^ | Jan. 1, 2006 | AP

Posted on 01/01/2006 11:56:48 AM PST by Ninian Dryhope

SAN ANTONIO — President Bush today strongly defended his domestic spying program, saying it's a limited initiative that tracks only incoming calls to the United States.

"It's seems logical to me that if we know there's a phone number associated with al-Qaida or an al-Qaida affiliate and they're making phone calls, it makes sense to find out why," Bush said. "They attacked us before, they'll attack us again."

Bush spoke to reporters at Brooke Army Medical Center where he was visiting wounded troops. He said the leak of information about the secret order to eavesdrop on Americans with suspected ties to terrorists causes "great harm to the nation."

Asked how he responds to Americans worried about violations of their privacy, he responded, "If somebody from al-Qaida is calling you, we'd like to know why."

The president said that he is conscious of people's civil liberties.

"This is a limited program designed to prevent attacks on the United States of America and, I repeat, limited," he said. "I think most Americans understand the need to find out what the enemy's thinking."

The Justice Department has begun investigating the leak to The New York Times that resulted in a story last month about warrantless surveillance conducted by the National Security Agency since the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

Bush, who called the program "vital and necessary," dodged a question about whether he was aware of any resistance to the program at high levels of his administration and how that might have influenced his decision to approve it.

He said the program has been reviewed by Justice Department officials and members of Congress and that it continues to be reviewed.

"The NSA program is one that listens to a few numbers called from the outside of the United States of known al-Qaida or affiliated people," he said, adding that he believes that he is acting within the law.

"The fact that somebody leaked this program causes great harm to the United States," he said. "There's an enemy out there."

Many Democrats and some Republicans in Congress have questioned whether Bush's actions have gone beyond the constitutional powers and congressional resolution he has cited in defense of his actions authorizing the secret program.

Sen. Arlen Specter, the Pennsylvania Republican who chairs the Judiciary Committee, has called for hearings into the program.

In 1978 Congress established a secret court to handle requests for surveillance and to issue warrants — a system the Bush-authorized program bypassed.

The president was asked whether he misled the American people in 2004 when, during an event promoting the Patriot Act, he said that any wiretapping required a court order and that nothing had changed. He made the statement more than two years after he approved the NSA program.

"I was talking about roving wiretaps, I believe, involving the Patriot Act," Bush said. "This is different from the NSA program."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: alqaeda; bamc; bush43; homelandsecurity; newyearsday; nsa; spying
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
Asked how he responds to Americans worried about violations of their privacy, he responded, "If somebody from al-Qaida is calling you, we'd like to know why."

You tell them, Mr. President.

1 posted on 01/01/2006 11:56:50 AM PST by Ninian Dryhope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ninian Dryhope

Great headline...the dangling particple strikes again!


2 posted on 01/01/2006 12:00:27 PM PST by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ninian Dryhope

It wouldn't matter if GW had a thousand and one warrants, the NYTimes and Liberals, dems would still seize on this as the scandal of the year. Better yet, an attack might happen which they could and would immediately blame on GW and the republican party. It's all about getting back in power by hook or by crook.


3 posted on 01/01/2006 12:06:06 PM PST by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ninian Dryhope
"If somebody from al-Qaida is calling you, we'd like to know why."

That's going to leave a mark.

4 posted on 01/01/2006 12:15:27 PM PST by Reactionary (The Liberal Social Order is a Hedonistic Idiocy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ninian Dryhope

HERE IS PRESIDENT BUSH"S AMMO

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1550295/posts



http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/default.htm#attacks

http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/




5 posted on 01/01/2006 12:21:58 PM PST by CHICAGOFARMER (Right to Carry (RTC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proxy_user

Not the same headline if you follow the link. The headline I saw was, "Bush visit to wounded troops sets year's tone".


6 posted on 01/01/2006 12:27:39 PM PST by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ninian Dryhope

Not the same headline. Did AP change it or did you?


7 posted on 01/01/2006 12:28:49 PM PST by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ninian Dryhope

> Asked how he responds to Americans worried about violations of their privacy, he responded, "If somebody from al-Qaida is calling you, we'd like to know why."

D*mn straight, Mr President, and well said!

Now aren't you glad *this* guy is in charge, rather than Gore of Kerry?


8 posted on 01/01/2006 12:35:26 PM PST by DieHard the Hunter (I am the Chieftain of my Clan. I bow to nobody. Get out of my way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ninian Dryhope

Maybe we should simply send these contacts packing. The problem is that these characters are IN the States. Maybe they shouldn't be.


9 posted on 01/01/2006 12:38:11 PM PST by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS
"Maybe they shouldn't be."

Time for some wet work. That would really get the lefties worked up about civil liberties.
10 posted on 01/01/2006 12:48:15 PM PST by Ninian Dryhope ("Bush lied, people dyed. Their fingers." The inestimable Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: proxy_user
Right. Why shouldn't the President have the right to spy on wounded troops?
11 posted on 01/01/2006 12:49:14 PM PST by Ninian Dryhope ("Bush lied, people dyed. Their fingers." The inestimable Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ninian Dryhope

Isn't hitlary on one of these defense boards, doesn't she want to find out the leak? Won't this look bad on her when she runs for pres?


12 posted on 01/01/2006 12:50:19 PM PST by longfellow (Bill Maher, the 21st hijacker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhombus
I pasted the headline in when I posted this, so they must have adjusted the headline after I made the post. I also pasted in the headline when I did the search to see if it had already been posted.
13 posted on 01/01/2006 12:51:53 PM PST by Ninian Dryhope ("Bush lied, people dyed. Their fingers." The inestimable Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Ninian Dryhope

Any naturalized American citizen who is found to have Al Kyda connections should be stripped of his passport and sent back to his place of origin.


14 posted on 01/01/2006 12:53:03 PM PST by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rhombus
Not me, probably the Houston Chronicle, since I think papers usually do their own headlines on AP stories, which is why we so often get multiple versions posted of the same story.
15 posted on 01/01/2006 12:53:21 PM PST by Ninian Dryhope ("Bush lied, people dyed. Their fingers." The inestimable Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ninian Dryhope
A lot of the concern about the "spying" is in the duh category. You mean our government is actually trying to monitor communications between terrrorists who are trying to kill us all?!? Gee, that sure is awful isn't it, I mean the government trying to protect its citizens from being slaughtered by fundamentalist Islamic wackos. Bush should be impeached! (/sarcasm)

I'm still amazed at the stupidity of libs who fail to grasp the basic concept of national security by wiretapping terrorists.

16 posted on 01/01/2006 1:15:53 PM PST by driftless ( For life-long happiness, learn how to play the accordion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ninian Dryhope

Maybe the paper got plenty of complaints for that original headline. They should have.


17 posted on 01/01/2006 1:45:02 PM PST by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: rhombus
They not only changed the headline, they rewrote the entire story. Compare what I posted with what shows up when you follow the link. The new story starts out talking about the hospital visit rather than starting out with the so called spy part.
18 posted on 01/01/2006 2:07:05 PM PST by Ninian Dryhope ("Bush lied, people dyed. Their fingers." The inestimable Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Ninian Dryhope

So why is Bush spying on wounded soldiers ?


19 posted on 01/01/2006 4:14:27 PM PST by festus (The constitution may be flawed but its a whole lot better than what we have now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: festus
He claims that it is to protect us, but as we all know, he really wants to trample on all our civil liberties on the way to establishing his dictatorship /s.
20 posted on 01/01/2006 7:40:41 PM PST by Ninian Dryhope ("Bush lied, people dyed. Their fingers." The inestimable Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson